2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.78.034006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroweak corrections to the charm quark contribution toK+π+νν¯

Abstract: We compute the leading-log QED, the next-to-leading-log QED-QCD, and the electroweak corrections to the charm quark contribution relevant for the rare decay K + → π + νν. The corresponding parameter P c (X) is increased by up to 2% with respect to the pure QCD estimate to P c (X) = 0.372 ± 0.015 for m c (m c ) = (1.286±0.013) GeV, α s (M Z ) = 0.1176±0.0020 and |V us | = 0.2255. For the branching ratio we find B(K + → π + νν) = (8.5 ± 0.7) × 10 −11 , where the quoted uncertainty is dominated by the CKM element… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known to NLO in QCD and electroweak interactions [36,38,42,44]. The parameter P c describes the short-distance contribution of the charm quark and has been calculated including NNLO QCD [45][46][47] and NLO electroweak corrections [48]. Other long-distance contributions are contained in the parameter δP c,u [43].…”
Section: Jhep02(2015)141mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known to NLO in QCD and electroweak interactions [36,38,42,44]. The parameter P c describes the short-distance contribution of the charm quark and has been calculated including NNLO QCD [45][46][47] and NLO electroweak corrections [48]. Other long-distance contributions are contained in the parameter δP c,u [43].…”
Section: Jhep02(2015)141mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in this case we choose the up-type quarks to be the SM mass eigenstate fields, so the factors of the CKM matrix move to the terms with the down-type quarks. Then D mixing implies for all models except Model XI, 39) where now η (X) mix = 1. Note that for Models V-VIII the constraint from D mixing is slightly stronger than from the real part of K mixing.…”
Section: Jhep10(2015)027mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For K + → π + ν iνi [36][37][38][39][40] where λ K (q 2 ) is a phase space factor, f + and f T are q 2 -dependent form factors. The B → πµ + µ − rate is obtained with obvious replacements.…”
Section: Jhep10(2015)027mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The branching ratio of this decay is predicted with high accuracy in the Standard Model: a recent calculation yields (8.5 ± 0.7) × 10 −11 , where the uncertainty is dominated by the CKM elements, as reported in [2] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%