2013
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004251.pub5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrotherapy for neck pain

Abstract: We cannot make any definite statements on the efficacy and clinical usefulness of electrotherapy modalities for neck pain. Since the evidence is of low or very low quality, we are uncertain about the estimate of the effect. Further research is very likely to change both the estimate of effect and our confidence in the results. Current evidence for PEMF, rMS, and TENS shows that these modalities might be more effective than placebo. When compared to other interventions the quality of evidence was very low thus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We included one review investigating electrotherapy modalities for neck pain (Kroeling 2013); and one review examining non‐pharmacological interventions in people with spinal cord injury (Boldt 2014). Both Kroeling 2013 and Boldt 2014 included studies examining TENS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We included one review investigating electrotherapy modalities for neck pain (Kroeling 2013); and one review examining non‐pharmacological interventions in people with spinal cord injury (Boldt 2014). Both Kroeling 2013 and Boldt 2014 included studies examining TENS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of the included reviews explicitly stated a minimum pain duration of more than 3 months (Boldt 2014;Hurlow 2012; Khadilkar 2008), while four reviews included only participants with conditions that were chronic in nature (Brosseau 2003; Gibson 2017; Johnson 2017; Rutjes 2009). One review included participants with acute, subacute or chronic neck pain (Kroeling 2013), although all participants in the TENS studies included in this review were considered to have chronic pain. Johnson 2015 did not specify a minimum pain duration for inclusion and therefore pain duration in some included studies could potentially have been less than the commonly used 3‐month definition of chronic pain (Treede 2015); however no relevant studies were found in this review and therefore this review was only further considered in terms of assessment of methods employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 7 years, there have been a number of systematic reviews/meta-analyses that have examined efficacy of TENS for pain reduction in people with neck pain [68], postoperative pain [69], cancer pain [70,71], labor pain [72], acute pain [73], low back pain [74,75] and osteoarthritis pain [58,76]. There have also been systematic reviews on the methodology of TENS [77,78].…”
Section: Evidence Of Tens For Pain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence-based physiotherapy can be defined as "high-quality clinical research, patients' preferences, and physiotherapists' practice knowledge" (Herbert et al 2009). Kroeling et al (2013) in their review examined the effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF), repetitive magnetic stimulation (rMS), and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on neck pain; PEMF and rMS were more effective than placebo, whereas TENS showed inconsistent results. They concluded that since the evidence was low they were uncertain about the estimated effect.…”
Section: Physiotherapy Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%