1991
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(91)90094-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatics and diffusion of molecules in solution: simulations with the University of Houston Brownian dynamics program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
395
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 462 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
395
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Structures and models were checked and compared by using PROCHECK (37) and WHATCHECK (38). Before running simulations, side-chain ionization states were adjusted to match the results of pK a calculations, performed as described (39), using UHBD (40) to calculate free energy differences between ionized and unionized side chains of the protein. Protonation states were then checked manually to assure no inappropriate results caused by the approximations of the method (41), and the H-bonding network was not optimized before the calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structures and models were checked and compared by using PROCHECK (37) and WHATCHECK (38). Before running simulations, side-chain ionization states were adjusted to match the results of pK a calculations, performed as described (39), using UHBD (40) to calculate free energy differences between ionized and unionized side chains of the protein. Protonation states were then checked manually to assure no inappropriate results caused by the approximations of the method (41), and the H-bonding network was not optimized before the calculation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structures are shown in Fig Analysis of electrostatic contributions to protein-ligand association energy requires that protonation states of their ionizable groups for given solution conditions are determined. The protonation probabilities of titrat-6 able groups in the eIF4E protein and terminal phosphate groups of m 7 GTP, m 7 Gp 4 ligands, corresponding to experimental conditions of the fluorescence titration measurements [24], were calculated as described in detail elsewhere [30,31], using the University of Houston Brownian Dynamics program (UHBD) [32,33]. For the purpose of predicting titration equilibria, all hydrogens were added and optimised with respect to their positions using CHARMM.…”
Section: Computational Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrostatic potentials were calculated by numerically solving the finite difference linearized PB equation using an incomplete Cholesky preconditioned conjugate gradient method as implemented in the University of Houston Brownian Dynamics (UHBD) program, version 4.0 (Davis et al, 1990). The OPLS parameter set (Jorgensen & Tirado-Rives, 1988), with the radii of hydrogen atoms set to 1.2 A, was used to assign atomic radii and partial charges.…”
Section: Electrostatics Calculations Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%