1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(97)01770-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatically deflectable polysilicon micromirrors — dynamic behaviour and comparison with the results from FEM modelling with ANSYS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pull-in analyses of the electrostatic torsional microactuators have been extensively reported in many literatures [1]- [14], and the analytical models have been derived for the calculation of the pull-in voltage and tilting angle. Degani et al [1]- [3] proposed a pull-in polynomial algebraic equation for the pull-in angle and pull-in voltage of electrostatic actuator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pull-in analyses of the electrostatic torsional microactuators have been extensively reported in many literatures [1]- [14], and the analytical models have been derived for the calculation of the pull-in voltage and tilting angle. Degani et al [1]- [3] proposed a pull-in polynomial algebraic equation for the pull-in angle and pull-in voltage of electrostatic actuator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usual numerical simulation techniques for the nonlinear structure based on the Finite Element Method (FEM) use staggered procedures iterating between the calculating the mechanical responses due to given electrostatic forces and calculating the electric field under a given geometry. When calculating the mechanical responses, the electrostatic force obtained from the electric field is obtained using the geometrical data in the previous iteration stage, and vice versa [3]. In general, the electrostatic field distributions are known to be efficiently calculated in numerical simulations using the Boundary Element Method (BEM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large deformations usually require the regeneration of the meshes for the FEM and the BEM numerical calculations, which makes the numerical calculation procedures very complicated and timeconsuming. Moreover, in the common FEM/BEM formulations infinitesimal strains and displacements are assumed; hence, the nonlinear effects due to large deformation effects cannot be included [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the literatures focus on the torsional motion of the micromirror, especially on the pull-in phenomenon (Degani et al 1998;Degani and Nemirovsky 2002;Zhang et al 2001). Some researchers also have investigated the dynamic characteristics of the micromirror Strozewski et al 1993;Fischer et al 1998;Sattler et al 2002;Evoy et al 1999;Kurth et al 1998), but few of them considered the coupled model of vertical translational and torsional motion simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, because the micromirror reflective plane is a large thin plate, distributed electrostatic force on it can also bring on small deformation of the plate, which can affect the bending stiffness of the system and the dynamic characteristic of the micromirror. In this paper, the intrinsic stress of the micromirror is neglected as the assumption in above literatures (Jung et al 2001;Xiao et al 2001;Nemirovsky and Degani 2001;Degani et al 1998;Degani and Nemirovsky 2002;Zhang et al 2001;Wetsel and Strozewski 1993;Strozewski et al 1993;Fischer et al 1998;Sattler et al 2002;Evoy et al 1999;Kurth et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%