2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatically assisted air coarse filtration for energy efficient ambient particles removal: Long-term performance in real environment and influencing factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of filtration efficiency is caused by the fluctuation of air temperature, moisture, particle concentration, and accumulation. [ 19 ] It is shown in Figure S16 (Supporting Information) that the PDA‐140@PET filter is insensitive to moisture when the air moisture content is below 9.5 g kg −1 (equally 48% relative humidity at 25 °C, or 65% relative humidity at 20 °C). SEM images in Figure S17 (Supporting Information) show the morphology of the PDA‐140@PET filter after the long‐term testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The variation of filtration efficiency is caused by the fluctuation of air temperature, moisture, particle concentration, and accumulation. [ 19 ] It is shown in Figure S16 (Supporting Information) that the PDA‐140@PET filter is insensitive to moisture when the air moisture content is below 9.5 g kg −1 (equally 48% relative humidity at 25 °C, or 65% relative humidity at 20 °C). SEM images in Figure S17 (Supporting Information) show the morphology of the PDA‐140@PET filter after the long‐term testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 53 ] However, in the 30 d running, though the air resistance of the PDA‐140@PET filter increased from 9.5 to 17.4 Pa, it is still far lower than equally high‐efficiency commercial filters (>100 Pa at equal air filtration velocity). [ 32 ] Compared with a commercial pleated electret filter which served the same period (Table S3, Supporting Information), [ 19 ] the EAA PDA‐140@PET filter showed higher average filtration efficiency and lower air resistance. In all, the EAA PDA‐140@PET filter showed steady high filtration efficiency and an acceptable air resistance increase in a 30 day long‐term running period, thus gave a superior performance to ventilation filtrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this conclusion should not be regarded as a general difference between filter-based air cleaners and electrostatic air cleaners. Tian et al [41][42][43][44] developed electrostatically assisted mechanical filters. Tian et al [45] also presented a comprehensive quality factor (CQF) to evaluate the performance of electrostatic particle removal technologies.…”
Section: Electrostatic Precipitator Vs Mechanical Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with medium-efficiency media filters widely used in existing air conditioning systems, electrostatic filters have similar filtration efficiency and lower resistance [14][15][16][17][18]. Another reason to consider using electrostatic filters in HVAC systems is that electrostatic filters can disinfect in addition to physically trapping pollutants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%