Low-barrier hydrogen bonds have recently been proposed as a major factor in enzyme catalysis. Here we evaluate the feasibility of transition state (TS) stabilization by low-barrier hydrogen bonds in enzymes. Our analysis focuses on the facts that (i) a low-barrier hydrogen bond is less stable than a regular hydrogen bond in water, (ii) TSs are more stable in the enzyme active sites than in water, and (iii) a nonpolar active site would destabilize the TS relative to its energy in water. Combining these points and other experimental and theoretical facts in a physically consistent framework shows that a low-barrier hydrogen bond cannot stabilize the TS more than an ordinary hydrogen bond. The reason for the large catalytic effect of active site hydrogen bonds is that their formation entails a lower reorganization energy than their solution counterparts, due to the preorganized enzyme environment.The origin of the enormous catalytic power of enzymes is a problem of great fundamental and practical importance. It is becoming increasingly clear that this catalytic power is mainly due to transition state (TS) stabilization, but there is yet to be a consensus on how the stabilization is provided. The uncatalyzed versions of reactions that are catalyzed by enzymes often proceed extremely slowly in aqueous solution. Associating the polarity of water with this slowness, a nonpolar environment has often been thought to be necessary for accelerating those reactions (1, 2). This has lead to proposals of enzymatic reaction mechanisms that are viable only in nonpolar media, whereas enzyme active sites are usually polar. One such proposal suggests that the enzyme forms a partial covalent bond with the ionic TS through a low-barrier hydrogen bond (LBHB) that is stabilized by quantum resonance interactions (3-5). Hydrogen bonds (HBs) do contribute substantially to enzyme catalysis. This fact has been gaining increasingly wider recognition, due, in part, to mutation experiments (6, 7) that confirmed earlier theoretical estimates of the catalytic HBs and the prediction that ''preorganized local dipoles'' (e.g., HBs and carbonyls) are very important in TS stabilization (8-10). However, the physical reasons for the importance of catalytic HBs are apparently still subject to debate (3)(4)(5)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15).Using a valence bond (VB) description of hydrogen bonding and analyzing energetic requirements, we conclude that LBHBs do not offer extra TS stabilization over regular HBs. This conclusion is independent of specific computational or experimental methodologies, although they are used to provide examples, hopefully making the arguments clearer.
Hydrogen BondingBelow we define ordinary HB (OHB) and LBHB in a way that will hopefully make the analysis amenable to a clear discussion. Note that terms such as ''short'' or ''low-barrier'' by themselves do not add any new physics to the regular HB description-i.e., they cannot define a new kind of HB. As we describe below, the only relevant and novel concept introduced by LBHBs is...