2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.10.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic self-assembly of TiO2 nanoparticles onto carbon spheres with enhanced adsorption capability for Cr(VI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the predominant Cr(VI) species in the solution would gradually change from monovalent HCrO 4 − to divalent CrO 4 2− and Cr 2 O 7 2− as the pH increases . At lower pH values, the Cr(VI) removal efficiency is high because the dominant Cr(VI) species is monovalent HCrO 4 − , which is more favorably adsorbed than CrO 4 2− or Cr 2 O 7 2− at the same concentration . Meanwhile, a large quantity of hydrogen and hydronium ions (H + and H 3 O + ) changed the functional groups through protonation (OH + H + ↔ OH + at low pH), which made the GFMO surface positively charged and increased the attractive force for the negatively charged Cr(VI) species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the predominant Cr(VI) species in the solution would gradually change from monovalent HCrO 4 − to divalent CrO 4 2− and Cr 2 O 7 2− as the pH increases . At lower pH values, the Cr(VI) removal efficiency is high because the dominant Cr(VI) species is monovalent HCrO 4 − , which is more favorably adsorbed than CrO 4 2− or Cr 2 O 7 2− at the same concentration . Meanwhile, a large quantity of hydrogen and hydronium ions (H + and H 3 O + ) changed the functional groups through protonation (OH + H + ↔ OH + at low pH), which made the GFMO surface positively charged and increased the attractive force for the negatively charged Cr(VI) species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the optimal pH, the adsorption experiments were performed with the varying pH of 1-11. 44 Meanwhile, at lower pH, abundance of hydronium ions (H + and H 3 O + ) in the solution can conjugate with the amino groups which made the surface of HDA-RGO-ZnFe 2 O 4 to be more positively charged. 8, the adsorption capacity first increases with the increase in pH from 1 to 2 and then decreases with the increase in pH from 2 to 11 4 2is predominant at pH > 6.…”
Section: Effect Of Solution Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorption free energy change for HCrO 4 -ion is lower than those of CrO 4 2-and Cr 2 O 7 2-ions. Therefore, HCrO 4 -is more easily adsorbed at acidic pH values resulting in a higher removal of Cr(VI) (Qian et al, 2012). It is also postulated that Cr(VI) can be reduced to Cr(III) at low pH values in the presence of a carbonaceous material such as bio-char.…”
Section: Chromium Sorption Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%