2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.06.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance effects of surface probe density on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)/peptide nucleic acid (PNA) hybridization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although an exact comparison is difficult because of the different experimental parameters and different NAs used but the k on , k off , and K d obtained in this study are in agreement with the range of data previously reported for PNA-NA hybridization on planar surfaces. 40,42,[54][55][56][57][58][59] It is important to note that under the experimental conditions used only the miRNA bound to the sensing zone of the nanopore influences the potential signal and therefore the unbound target strands in the sample bulk do not need to be removed. This is a clear advantage of the proposed potentiometric label-free sensing principle compared with conventional heterogeneous phase hybridization assays based on labels and end-point detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an exact comparison is difficult because of the different experimental parameters and different NAs used but the k on , k off , and K d obtained in this study are in agreement with the range of data previously reported for PNA-NA hybridization on planar surfaces. 40,42,[54][55][56][57][58][59] It is important to note that under the experimental conditions used only the miRNA bound to the sensing zone of the nanopore influences the potential signal and therefore the unbound target strands in the sample bulk do not need to be removed. This is a clear advantage of the proposed potentiometric label-free sensing principle compared with conventional heterogeneous phase hybridization assays based on labels and end-point detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1:0 and 1:0.25), they are also, on average, separated further apart from the neighboring probes by the T9 spacer. This reduces steric hindrances and results in an increased accessibility of the target cDNA to hybridize [37][38][39], as well as for NcDNA to interact with the aligned probes. The negative S/N values seen at ratio 1:0 and 1:0.25 are due to the negative current change caused by interaction with NcDNA, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this means that the very low concentration of target DNA in actual samples will yield very low signals as well. In addition, even if there is enough target DNA, the surface density is limited by the electrostatic charges of the negatively‐charged DNA probes attached . To address this issue on sensitivity, the signal can be improved through nucleic acid self‐assembly processes wherein additional probes are designed to create DNA nanostructures that will lead to an increase in the signal.…”
Section: Immobilized Electrochemical Dna Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%