2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic multipole for electrical resistivity measurements at the decimetric scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For various test materials, good agreement was observed between measurements using the multipole and those using galvanic contact resistivity measurements, in which the electrode array accurately reproduced the pole geometry (Souffaché et al . ).…”
Section: Methods and Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For various test materials, good agreement was observed between measurements using the multipole and those using galvanic contact resistivity measurements, in which the electrode array accurately reproduced the pole geometry (Souffaché et al . ).…”
Section: Methods and Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…3b, a part of the peninsula Tromsøya with the city Tromsø and the lake is visible. Lake Prestvannet covers an area of about 10 ha, has a maximum depth of 4 m and is covered by ice most of the year (Stabbel, 1985). Although no quantitative statement is made, investigations of the lake water qualitatively indicate a high salinity (https://memim.com/ prestvannet.html, last access: 29 August 2019).…”
Section: Tromsømentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CC resistivity system works by injecting an alternating current (AC) into the ground and measuring the potential of the ground capacitively without galvanic coupling (Grard and Tabbagh, 1991;Timofeev et al, 1994;Kuras et al, 2006). Compared with the conventional direct current (DC) resistivity method, the CC resistivity method is more suitable for use in permafrost, mountains, and urban areas where setting up the electrodes is challenging (Tabbagh et al, 1993;Hauck and Kneisel, 2006;Perez-Gracia et al, 2009;Souffache et al, 2010). In addition, because there is no need to install the steel electrodes, the CC resistivity measurement is less time consuming than the traditional DC resistivity measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%