2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.07.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic Interactions and Binding Orientation of HIV-1 Matrix Studied by Neutron Reflectivity

Abstract: The N-terminal matrix (MA) domain of the HIV-1 Gag protein is responsible for binding to the plasma membrane of host cells during viral assembly. The putative membrane-binding interface of MA was previously mapped by means of mutagenesis and analysis of its trimeric crystal structure. However, the orientation of MA on membranes has not been directly determined by experimental measurements. We present neutron reflectivity measurements that resolve the one-dimensional scattering length density profile of MA boun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
68
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our interpretation may seem contrary to published neutron reflectivity results [6,55]. However, Ref.…”
Section: Location Of the Peptides In The Membrane Mimicscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our interpretation may seem contrary to published neutron reflectivity results [6,55]. However, Ref.…”
Section: Location Of the Peptides In The Membrane Mimicscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, Ref. [55] used NR to study the non-myristoylated MA protein which was positioned at the surface of a bilayer containing saturated lipids. The results in Ref.…”
Section: Location Of the Peptides In The Membrane Mimicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPR responses at high c p were accordingly corrected. From a calibration of the SPR instrument (37), we estimate that a densely packed monolayer of MA protein corresponds to an instrument response of R ϱ Ϸ 58 pixels, as determined from its molecular cross section (A ϭ 786 Å 2 ), assessed from the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure (26), in the membranebound orientation (38) and the molecular weight. Free binding energies (⌬G) were then calculated from the K d value:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following observations suggest that this is not the case. 1) Structural investigations with NR of other proteins at membrane surfaces, conducted at similar protein surface concentrations (21,34,38), showed clearly that protein organization depended on other factors (electrostatic interaction; ligand binding) than surface crowding. 2) A model that places proteins randomly on the surface (39) predicts mean nearest neighbor distances of 1.6 or 2.25 protein diameters, respectively, for area coverages of 20% (myrG55) or 10% (G55).…”
Section: Structure Of the Grasp Domainmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Complex with the Membrane-To correlate the functional requirements for membrane tethering with structural details of the GRASP domain complex with a membrane, we studied the latter with NR, a technique that can determine the orientation of membranebound proteins of sufficient shape anisotropy within tight limits (34) and their localization along the membrane normal with Angstrom precision (24 O differ in neutron scattering lengths, regions of the surface structure that contain water contribute differently to the scattering in isotopically distinct buffers, thereby facilitating the characterization of such regions within the sample. Neutron scattering is nondestructive, which allows all measurements to be conducted on the same sample area under identical conditions (19,35).…”
Section: Structure Of the Grasp Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%