1983
DOI: 10.1017/s0263034600000057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic fields and charged particle acceleration in laser produced plasmas

Abstract: While the action of electrostatic double layers in the periphery of an expanding laser produced plasma has been discussed and treated many years ago, some new aspects pioneered recently by Alfven in the theory of cosmic plasmas, indicate the possibility of a new treatment. The thermally produced electrostatic double layer which has been re-derived for a homogeneous plasma shows that a strong upshift of ion energies (by the mass ratio) is possible, in agreement with experiments. The number of accelerated ions i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The macroscopic hydrodynamic theory for the consequent description of the double layers and the generated electric fields required the use of the complete two fluids for electrons and ions including collisions, viscosity, equipartition of temperatures between ions and electrons, optical constants with the correct nonlinear dependence on the laser intensity (about an incorrect formula, see e.g., Duderstadt and Moses, 1983), and including the general expression of the nonlinear force apart from the thermokinetic force given by the gas dynamic pressure (Hora, 1969(Hora, , 1981(Hora, , 1985a. In one spatial dimension, the problem was then to solve the following seven quantities depending on the spatial coordinate x and the time t for given initial and boundary values: the density, temperature and velocity (in the x-direction) for electrons, the same for ions (ne, Te, ve, n_, T_, Vi) and the electric field E (in the x-direction) differing from the external electric and magnetic fields EL and He of the incident laser radiation.…”
Section: The Genuine Two-fluid Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The macroscopic hydrodynamic theory for the consequent description of the double layers and the generated electric fields required the use of the complete two fluids for electrons and ions including collisions, viscosity, equipartition of temperatures between ions and electrons, optical constants with the correct nonlinear dependence on the laser intensity (about an incorrect formula, see e.g., Duderstadt and Moses, 1983), and including the general expression of the nonlinear force apart from the thermokinetic force given by the gas dynamic pressure (Hora, 1969(Hora, , 1981(Hora, , 1985a. In one spatial dimension, the problem was then to solve the following seven quantities depending on the spatial coordinate x and the time t for given initial and boundary values: the density, temperature and velocity (in the x-direction) for electrons, the same for ions (ne, Te, ve, n_, T_, Vi) and the electric field E (in the x-direction) differing from the external electric and magnetic fields EL and He of the incident laser radiation.…”
Section: The Genuine Two-fluid Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the expression "inhomogeneity field" or "dynamic electric field" has been used. In the stationary approximation (8) the inhomogeneity field corresponds to the (thermionic) work function for the electrons that moved from the plasma interior to the vacuum (or an electrode) outside corresponding to the spread Debye sheath (Hora, 1983).…”
Section: In Plasma Without Laser Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The generalized gain calculations include then fuel depletion, and reheat by the stopping power of the charged fusion reaction products (alphas for DT) (Hora et al 1979) and a revised formulation of losses by bremsstrahlung. There are good reasons due to the alpha spectra from laser fusion pellets (Hofstadter 1979;Miley 1981) in favour of the collective model (Rag et al 1976), if the measured (Gazit et al 1979) upshift of the alphas by the electrostatic double layer on expansion is included correctly (Hora 1983). The model for the stopping power used in one series of calculations was the collective model (Ray et al 1976).…”
Section: Gain Calculation With Spin Polarized Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%