1991
DOI: 10.1093/protein/4.8.903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models

Abstract: Two approaches for calculating electrostatic effects in proteins are compared and an analysis is presented of the dependence of calculated properties on the model used to define the charge distribution. Changes in electrostatic free energy have been calculated using a screened Coulomb potential (SCP) with a distance-dependent effective dielectric permittivity to model bulk solvent effects and a finite difference approach to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann (FDPB) equation. The properties calculated include shifts i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
184
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
184
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second term is a directional hydrogen bond based potential term (Goodford, 1985). Screened Coulomb potentials where a distance dependent dielectric constant is used to model solvent effects describe the third term (Mehler, 1991). The loss of conformational entropy due to binding is calculated in the fourth and fifth terms.…”
Section: Molecular Systems and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second term is a directional hydrogen bond based potential term (Goodford, 1985). Screened Coulomb potentials where a distance dependent dielectric constant is used to model solvent effects describe the third term (Mehler, 1991). The loss of conformational entropy due to binding is calculated in the fourth and fifth terms.…”
Section: Molecular Systems and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grid spacing was set to 0.375 Å, with 70 grid points centered on calcium ion 1. The electrostatic interaction energy grid used a sigmoidal distance-dependent dielectric function (22) to account for the solvent-screening effect. Self-consistent 12-6 Lennard-Jones coefficients (19) were used along with a distance criterion with sinusoidal directional attenuation to account for hydrogen bonding (21).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lennard-jones parameters 12-10 and 12-6 (supplied with the program package) were used for modeling H-bonds and van der Waals interactions, respectively. The distance-dependent dielectric permittivity of Mehler and Solmajer was used in the calculations of the electrostatic grid maps (26). The Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) with the pseudo-Solis and Wets modification (LGA/pSW) method was used with default parameters except for the 0 maximum number of energy evaluations 0 which was increased to 1 million from …”
Section: Docking Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%