2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9317(02)00501-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic chuck behaviour at ambient conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) Electrostatic Chuck. The only known way to clamp a wafer to a very flat reference plane inside the UHV TXRF analysis chamber and to move the whole assembly into a vertical orientation without touching any point of the wafer surface is to use an ESC . The bipolar ESC employed was developed by the Fraunhofer Institut für Angewandte Optik und Feinmechanik (IOF).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Electrostatic Chuck. The only known way to clamp a wafer to a very flat reference plane inside the UHV TXRF analysis chamber and to move the whole assembly into a vertical orientation without touching any point of the wafer surface is to use an ESC . The bipolar ESC employed was developed by the Fraunhofer Institut für Angewandte Optik und Feinmechanik (IOF).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 8c, MIN was mainly of type 1 ⃝, and the porosity was 1.80%. Figure 8b MED was dominated by 1 ⃝ and 2 ⃝ types, with a porosity of 3.27%, and the porosity was mainly affected by the interaction between the current and the spraying distance, and, when the current was small and the spraying distance was large, the difference in the thermal expansion coefficient between the coatings caused the cooling stress to increase, which was closely related to the difference in the thermal expansion coefficient and the residual stress of the coatings [28]. Stress increased the generation and propagation of microcracks in the coating, which increased the porosity to a certain extent.…”
Section: Analysis Of Pore Typesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This suggests that a reduction in porosity enhances the overall integrity and adhesion of the coating. With the change of APS process parameters, the pore size and crack direction were classified in this study, and the pore diameter below 10 µm was regarded as type 1 ⃝, the pore diameter of 10-25 µm was regarded as type 2 ⃝, and the pore diameter was more than 25 µm as type 3 ⃝. As shown in Figure 8c, MIN was mainly of type 1 ⃝, and the porosity was 1.80%.…”
Section: Analysis Of Pore Typesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations