2007
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.101469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic and Steric Interactions Determine Bacteriorhodopsin Single-Molecule Biomechanics

Abstract: Bacteriorhodopsin (bR) is a haloarchaeal membrane protein that converts the energy of single photons into large structural changes to directionally pump protons across purple membrane. This is achieved by a complex combination of local dynamic interactions controlling bR biomechanics at the submolecular level, producing efficient amplification of the retinal photoisomerization. Using single molecule force spectroscopy at different salt concentrations, we show that tryptophan (Trp) residues use steric specific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) Processes 1) and 2) were repeated 10 10 times, and we finally calculated the average matching probability, p match , as a function of n rand . For simulation C (N), the summation of the matching probability, P n sim %n rand P match ðn rand Þ, was 0.00043 (24), 0.0043 (20), 0.087 (21), (0.15 (20), and 0.37 (21)), indicating that the matches of the peak positions between the experiments and simulation C were not regarded as accidental coincidence, while the concordance rates were less satisfactory for simulation N. This indicates that our simulation condition may be closer to the experimental conditions of Sapra et al (24) and Kessler and Gaub (20) than to those of Voïtch-ovsky et al (21). Note that the peak positions were not recorded in the interval [0,60] in the extraction from the N-terminus by Kessler and Gaub (20), and we could not obtain any match in this portion.…”
Section: Comparison With the Experimental F-d Curvesmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3) Processes 1) and 2) were repeated 10 10 times, and we finally calculated the average matching probability, p match , as a function of n rand . For simulation C (N), the summation of the matching probability, P n sim %n rand P match ðn rand Þ, was 0.00043 (24), 0.0043 (20), 0.087 (21), (0.15 (20), and 0.37 (21)), indicating that the matches of the peak positions between the experiments and simulation C were not regarded as accidental coincidence, while the concordance rates were less satisfactory for simulation N. This indicates that our simulation condition may be closer to the experimental conditions of Sapra et al (24) and Kessler and Gaub (20) than to those of Voïtch-ovsky et al (21). Note that the peak positions were not recorded in the interval [0,60] in the extraction from the N-terminus by Kessler and Gaub (20), and we could not obtain any match in this portion.…”
Section: Comparison With the Experimental F-d Curvesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…With regard to the extraction speed, the value of v cl 1 is remarkably larger than that adopted in previous experiments (20,21,24 Making use of the similarity rule as mentioned above, our simulation can be interpreted as that with another extraction speed, v cl 2 ¼ v cl 1 /k. The value of the k is chosen so that it represents the ratio of the PM viscosity to that of bulk water.…”
Section: Extraction Speedmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations