1994
DOI: 10.1021/ie00034a032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic and Electrokinetic Interactions during Protein Transport through Narrow Pore Membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
1
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(25 reference statements)
6
76
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Zeta potential of -20.0 mV for BSA and 7.7 mV for LF were obtained working with KCl and NaCl electrolytes at pH 7.0 being the difference of these values the highest observed. Under the selected conditions the separation BSA/LF by ultrafiltration using charged membranes is expected to be enhanced.…”
Section: Zeta Potential Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 Zeta potential of -20.0 mV for BSA and 7.7 mV for LF were obtained working with KCl and NaCl electrolytes at pH 7.0 being the difference of these values the highest observed. Under the selected conditions the separation BSA/LF by ultrafiltration using charged membranes is expected to be enhanced.…”
Section: Zeta Potential Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To maximize the effectiveness of the separation processes, an accurate description of the effect of physicochemical interactions between protein molecules is necessary [8]. Particle size measurements allow the correct selection of the membrane cut-off, as well as the proper prediction of protein aggregation and foaming, thus allowing for the correct selection of buffers, pH and temperatures for storage [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the transmissions of both myoglobin and lysozyme through chemicallymodified, negatively charged PAN-C membrane increased with the increase in ionic strength. This is attributed to the fact that, in the presence of salt the hydrophobic interactions between proteins and membrane can be decreased while the intra-hydrophobic interactions of the protein molecules can be significantly enhanced [34], moreover, the enlarged conformation of charged proteins becomes more compact due to the effect of ionic shielding [1,26,[35][36][37]. Additionally, the increase in ionic strength of the protein solution causes weakening of the electrostatic interaction between the protein and membrane, since the Na þ and Cl -ions decrease the activity coefficient of protonation at pH below the isoelectric points of myoglobin and lysozyme [32].…”
Section: Effect Of Ionic Strength Of the Protein Solution On Protein mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was recognized that significant improvements in the ultrafiltration of the proteins can be obtained by controlling the pH and ionic strength of the protein solution. Pujar and Zydney (1994) found that the transmission of bovin serum albumin (BSA) through a 100 kDa membrane increased by more than two orders of magnitude as the salt concentration was increased from 1.5 mM to 150 mM [1]. This was attributed to the increased electrostatic exclusion of the charged BSA from the membrane pores at low ionic salt concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ultrafiltration was originally viewed as a purely size-based exclusion phenomenon, it is now well established that protein transmission is strongly affected by electrostatic interactions between the charged protein and any charged groups on the polymer membrane. These effects can be quite dramatic, with the sieving coefficient reduced by more than 100-fold due as the salt concentration is lowered from 100 to 1 mM (Pujar and Zydney, 1994).…”
Section: Ultrafiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%