“…Electrospun nanofibers-derived hollow carbon fibers incorporated with lithiophilic Au nanoparticles (Au@HCF) were prepared to serve as the reliable Li host framework. 230 It was found that Au@HCF Au@HCF could mitigate Li dendrite growth on the top surface guide Li plating and stripping to the core space of the structure, thus rendering the stabilized solid-electrolyte interphase layer. Benefitting from these, a high Coulombic efficiency up to 99%-99.9% under 1 mA cm −2 and 2 mAh cm −2 was achieved.…”
Solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs), being the key component of solid‐state lithium batteries, have a significant impact on battery performance. Rational materials structure and composition engineering on SSEs are promising to improve their Li+ conductivity, interfacial contact, and mechanical integrity. Among the fabrication approaches, the electrospinning technique has attracted tremendous attention due to its own merits in constructing a three‐dimensional framework of SSEs with precise porosity structure, tunable materials composition, easy operation, and superior physicochemical properties. To this end, in this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the recent development of electrospinning techniques for high‐performance SSEs. Firstly, we introduce the historical development of SSEs and summarize the fundamentals, including the Li+ transport mechanism and materials selection principle. Then, the versatility of electrospinning technologies in the construction of the three main types of SSEs and stabilization of lithium metal anodes is comprehensively discussed. Finally, a perspective on future research directions based on previous work is highlighted for developing high‐performance solid‐state lithium batteries based on electrospinning techniques.
“…Electrospun nanofibers-derived hollow carbon fibers incorporated with lithiophilic Au nanoparticles (Au@HCF) were prepared to serve as the reliable Li host framework. 230 It was found that Au@HCF Au@HCF could mitigate Li dendrite growth on the top surface guide Li plating and stripping to the core space of the structure, thus rendering the stabilized solid-electrolyte interphase layer. Benefitting from these, a high Coulombic efficiency up to 99%-99.9% under 1 mA cm −2 and 2 mAh cm −2 was achieved.…”
Solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs), being the key component of solid‐state lithium batteries, have a significant impact on battery performance. Rational materials structure and composition engineering on SSEs are promising to improve their Li+ conductivity, interfacial contact, and mechanical integrity. Among the fabrication approaches, the electrospinning technique has attracted tremendous attention due to its own merits in constructing a three‐dimensional framework of SSEs with precise porosity structure, tunable materials composition, easy operation, and superior physicochemical properties. To this end, in this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the recent development of electrospinning techniques for high‐performance SSEs. Firstly, we introduce the historical development of SSEs and summarize the fundamentals, including the Li+ transport mechanism and materials selection principle. Then, the versatility of electrospinning technologies in the construction of the three main types of SSEs and stabilization of lithium metal anodes is comprehensively discussed. Finally, a perspective on future research directions based on previous work is highlighted for developing high‐performance solid‐state lithium batteries based on electrospinning techniques.
“… Hou et al (2019 ) synthesized homogeneously distributed Ag nanoparticles on Cu foil via an electroless plating process for a lithiophilic current collector, which effectively reduced the nucleation overpotential from 240 to 50 mV, realizing uniform lithium nucleation and subsequently stable lithium plating/stripping. Kim et al (2021 ) fabricated a 1D hollow carbon fiber incorporating with lithiophilic Au nanoparticles as lithiophilic nucleation sites on Cu foil (Au@HCF), reducing the current density and confining lithium to mitigate dendrite growth. The Au@HCF achieved CE of 99.9% under 1 mA/cm 2 with 2 mAh/cm 2 lithium plating/stripping ( Figure 2A ).…”
Section: Engineering Strategies For Anode Current Collectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“… (A) Schematic representation of lithium plating on the bare on the Au@ hollow carbon fiber electrodes and STEM image of Au@ hollow carbon fiber and C, N, and Au EDS elemental mapping ( Kim et al, 2021 ). (B) Diagram of the mechanism of polydopamine-induced Li deposition and the SEM images of the PDA-Cu foil (cross view) ( He et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Engineering Strategies For Anode Current Collectormentioning
Lithium metal anodes have attracted extensive attention due to their high theoretical capacity and low redox potential. However, low Coulombic efficiency, serious parasitic reaction, large volume change, and dendrite growth during cycling have hindered their practical application. The engineering of an anode current collector provides important advances to solve these problems, eliminate excess lithium usage, and substantially increase the energy density. In this review, we summarize the engineering strategies of an anode current collector with emphasis on different methods and applications in lithium metal-based systems. Finally, the perspectives and challenges of current collector engineering for lithium metal anode are discussed.
“…Metallic lithium (Li) has attracted increasing attention as a promising next-generation anode material owing to its attractive properties, such as high theoretical capacity (3860 mAh g –1 ) and low operating potential (−3.04 V vs standard hydrogen electrode). − However, poor Coulombic efficiency (CE) and catastrophic safety issues, mainly originating from the undesirable dendritic Li growth, have impeded its practical applications. To overcome these inherent shortcomings, considerable efforts have been devoted to realizing Li anodes in Li-metal batteries, including the development of three-dimensional (3D) conductive hosts, − functional electrolytes, − protection layers, − and solid electrolytes. − Among them, the 3D structures consisting of Cu nanowires or carbon materials such as graphite, graphene, and carbon nanotubes can reduce the effective current density and store metallic Li in the inner space of the host; the Li dendrite growth and drastic volume expansion during cycling can be largely mitigated in the 3D Li host. ,,, However, despite these advantages, internal short circuits can take place by the preferential Li deposition on the top surface of the structure (i.e., top plating) due to its conductive nature, eventually hindering the use of the bottom region of the host as Li storage space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the manufacturing process is rather complicated, and metallic Li deposited inside the host would be exposed to the electrolyte, which leads to electrolyte depletion and an increase in the thickness of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer. ,,, Moreover, this weak point can act as a fatal issue in the actual pouch-level cell if a lean electrolyte is applied to realize a high-energy-density cell. Conversely, although core–shell structures containing lithiophilic materials such as Ag, Au, and Zn that can store metallic Li inside the host have been introduced to reduce the volume change and the side reactions by preventing direct contact between Li and electrolyte during prolonged cycling, ,, these structural designs also have problems in that it is difficult to easily diffuse Li-ions inside these structures with the carbon shell hindering Li-ion transport especially at high current density conditions, which leads to Li top plating and thus reduces somewhat their capability for storing Li. Therefore, for realizing the practical cell application, it is desirable to develop a Li-confinable host capable of preventing direct contact with the electrolyte by storing Li inside the structure even at practical levels of current densities.…”
Li-confinable
core–shell hosts have been extensively studied
because they mitigate Li dendrite growth and volume change by reducing
the effective current density and storing Li inside the core space
during consecutive cycling. However, despite these fascinating features,
these hosts suffer from unwanted Li growth on their surface (i.e.,
top plating) due to the carbon shell hindering Li-ion movement especially
at higher current densities and capacities, resulting in poor electrochemical
performance. In this study, we propose a one-dimensional porous Li-confinable
host with lithiophilic Au (Au@PHCF), which is synthesized by a scalable
dual-nozzle electrospinning. Because of the well-interconnected conductive
networks forming three-dimensional structure, porous shell design
enabling facile Li-ion transport, and hollow core space with lithiophilic
Au storing metallic Li, the Au@PHCF can suppress the Li top plating
and improve the Li stripping/plating efficiency compared to their
counterparts even at 5 mA cm–2, eventually achieving
stable cycling performances of the LiFePO4 full cell and
Au@PHCF-Li symmetric cell for over 1000 and 2000 cycles, respectively.
Finite element analysis reveals that the structural merit and lithiophilicity
of Au enable fast reversible Li operation at the designated core space
of the Au@PHCF, implying that the structural design of the Li-confinable
host is crucial for the stable operation of promising Li-metal batteries
at a practical test level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.