Electrospun anatase TiO₂nanorods for flexible optoelectronic devices

Colorful Hydrophobic Poly(Vinyl Butyral)/Cationic Dye Fibrous Membranes via a Colored Solution Electrospinning Process

“…The electrospun (e-spun) nanofibers can be collected as nanofiber membrane (NFM) and have been found in various applications such as tissue engineering scaffolds, [5, 6] drug delivery, [6, 7] wound dressing, [8, 9] high efficiency particulate air filter, [10] flexible nano-optoelectronic devices, [11, 12] nanosensors, [12, 13] protective clothing, [14, 15], and so on. However, the typical e-spun NFM usually appears white, which is the common color of polymers and mainly due to the physical phenomenon of light scattering [16, 17].…”

A Fully Transparent, Flexible, Sensitive, and Visible‐Blind Ultraviolet Sensor Based on Carbon Nanotube–Graphene Hybrid

“…1D and 2D semiconducting materials such as ZnO, TiO 2 , GaTe, and MoS 2 are promising candidates for photodetection because of their direct bandgap at room temperature, transparency in the visible region, and mechanical flexibility . Accordingly, those materials have been used for the active component of sensitive, transparent, and flexible UV sensors . The UV sensors based on nanomaterials generally show high‐performance in terms of photoresponsivity and response/recovery time, but most of them still rely on intrinsically opaque metal electrodes .…”

“…Accordingly, those materials have been used for the active component of sensitive, transparent, and flexible UV sensors . The UV sensors based on nanomaterials generally show high‐performance in terms of photoresponsivity and response/recovery time, but most of them still rely on intrinsically opaque metal electrodes . Although a few works have reported UV sensors where all the active or passive components were transparent, the brittle electrode (e.g., indium tin oxide; ITO) limits the flexibility of the sensor, since ITO easily fractures under a strain of only 1% .…”

“…[7][8][9][10] 1D and 2D semiconducting materials such as ZnO, TiO 2 , GaTe, and MoS 2 are promising candidates for photodetection because of their direct bandgap at room temperature, transparency in the visible region, and mechanical flexibility. [15][16][17][18][19] The UV sensors based on nanomaterials generally show high-performance in terms of photoresponsivity and response/recovery time, but most of them still rely on intrinsically opaque metal electrodes. [15][16][17][18][19] The UV sensors based on nanomaterials generally show high-performance in terms of photoresponsivity and response/recovery time, but most of them still rely on intrinsically opaque metal electrodes.…”

“…[11][12][13][14] Accordingly, those materials have been used for the active component of sensitive, transparent, and flexible UV sensors. [15,16] Although a few works have reported UV sensors where all the active or passive components were transparent, [17,18] the brittle electrode (e.g., indium tin oxide; ITO) limits the flexibility of the sensor, since ITO easily fractures under a strain of only 1%. [15,16] Although a few works have reported UV sensors where all the active or passive components were transparent, [17,18] the brittle electrode (e.g., indium tin oxide; ITO) limits the flexibility of the sensor, since ITO easily fractures under a strain of only 1%.…”