2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-019-02494-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroplating for chromium removal from tannery wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass ratio of monomer is 5:1, the amount of initiator is 1.2%, and the absorption rate of ionized water is 2216 g g −1 wastewater. [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122] The ordinate is the content of each component based on Log10; all units are expressed in mg L −1 with the exception of pH.…”
Section: Cross-linked Oxidized Starchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass ratio of monomer is 5:1, the amount of initiator is 1.2%, and the absorption rate of ionized water is 2216 g g −1 wastewater. [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122] The ordinate is the content of each component based on Log10; all units are expressed in mg L −1 with the exception of pH.…”
Section: Cross-linked Oxidized Starchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sheet electrodes of steel, copper, and lead materials were investigated in one study for Cr cathode deposition, 99% recover of total chromium was achieved within 2 h mainly in the form of Cr(OH) 3 from TWW sample [143]. A cost-effective electrochemical system employed with graphite and aluminum as anode and cathode was observed with 96.5% removal efficacy of total chromium in one real TWW treatment experiment [144]. Since segregation and recovery of chromium always has a priority in case of TWW treatment, combination of anode oxidation and cathode reduction may provide a new direction for simultaneous removal of recalcitrant organic pollutants and Cr (III).…”
Section: Electrochemical Reduction and Microbial Fuel Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These electrolytes can be a real alternative; however, the electrochemical reactions that take place in the electrodeposition of chromium from Cr(III) salt solutions are complicated and their understanding still needs to be studied. In an electrodeposition process using electroplating, the removal of chromium ions from tannery wastewater was evaluated in a synthetic trivalent chromium solution; 96.5% of the total chromium content was removed in the untreated effluent [ 88 ]. Finally the route dictated by the thermodynamics of the multistep reduction of Cr(III) to Cr evidences that metallic chromium is probably deposited through the discharge of electroactive hydroxo complexes of bivalent chromium that form in the near-cathode layer due to the dissociation of water molecules [ 89 , 90 ], but it is still necessary to evaluate this process more extensively in tannery wastewater.…”
Section: Technologies For the Treatment Of Tannery Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%