2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological study of contextual variations in a short-term face recognition task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This blurred representation is sufficient to activate predictions about the identity of the object, which are then integrated downstream into the visual cortex along with the bottom-up stream of analysis to facilitate recognition. In this view, memory effect has already been observed on the N170 also during short-term recognition (e.g., Guillaume & Tiberghien, 2001, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This blurred representation is sufficient to activate predictions about the identity of the object, which are then integrated downstream into the visual cortex along with the bottom-up stream of analysis to facilitate recognition. In this view, memory effect has already been observed on the N170 also during short-term recognition (e.g., Guillaume & Tiberghien, 2001, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For example, some authors have reported that only the parietal old/new effect related to recollection is affected by LOP (Greve, Rossum, & Donaldson, ; Paller & Kutas, ), while others have found both the mid‐frontal N400 and parietal old/new effects to be affected by LOP (Rugg, Allan, & Birch, ). In this context, a dissociation between early ERP fluency effects related to perceptual or conceptual priming during the 300–500 ms time window (Guillaume & Tiberghien, ; Voss et al, ) and late ERP fluency effects related to the interpretation of fluency (i.e., as evidence of something other than prior study: Kurilla & Gonsalves, ) has emerged. Interestingly, this fluency can emanate from perceptual features (e.g., Bruett & Leynes, ) as well as from conceptual overlap (e.g.,Voss et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Importantly, in these designs, the specific information that was associated to the studied face was presented at study but absent at test. Considering that perceptual mismatch causes modulations in the ERP correlates of face recognition (e.g., Groh-Bordin et al, 2006;Guillaume and Tiberghien, 2005), the possibility that the lack of information associated with the face at study time could disrupt automatic matching of the recognized face, and thus the ERP correlates of familiarity, cannot be neglected. The situation gets even more complicated if we consider that changes between study and test affect familiarity in different ways depending on what information is modified and whether or not it was unified with the face at study time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%