2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.03.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological properties and chemosensitivity of acutely dissociated trigeminal somata innervating the cornea

Abstract: Adult rat sensory trigeminal ganglion neurons innervating the cornea (cTGNs) were isolated and identified following retrograde dye labeling with FM1-43. Using standard whole-cell patch clamp recording techniques, cTGNs could be subdivided by their action potential (AP) duration. Fast cTGNs had AP durations < 1 ms (40%) while slow cTGNs had AP durations > 1 ms and an inflexion on the repolarization phase of the AP. With the exception of membrane input resistance, the passive membrane properties of fast cTGNs we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When AP and AHP features were compared between TRG and DRG cell types, the difference of current injection protocols between the present TRG and earlier DRG studies should be noted. The long current injection used in the present study has frequently been used to generate AP and AHP in many other TRG in vitro studies (López de Armentia et al 2000;Park et al 2009;Takeda et al 2004aTakeda et al ,b, 2005Takeda et al , 2006Tsutsui et al 2008;Veiga Moreira et al 2007;Yoshida and Matsumoto 2005;Yoshida et al 2007). The durations of AP and AHP are thought to be prolonged and shortened, respectively, by the injected current compared with those of physiologically induced AP and AHP in vivo.…”
Section: Ap Features In Trg Cellsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When AP and AHP features were compared between TRG and DRG cell types, the difference of current injection protocols between the present TRG and earlier DRG studies should be noted. The long current injection used in the present study has frequently been used to generate AP and AHP in many other TRG in vitro studies (López de Armentia et al 2000;Park et al 2009;Takeda et al 2004aTakeda et al ,b, 2005Takeda et al , 2006Tsutsui et al 2008;Veiga Moreira et al 2007;Yoshida and Matsumoto 2005;Yoshida et al 2007). The durations of AP and AHP are thought to be prolonged and shortened, respectively, by the injected current compared with those of physiologically induced AP and AHP in vivo.…”
Section: Ap Features In Trg Cellsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on the in vivo studies, dissociated TRG and DRG cells have been classified into two (F-and S-types) or four (types I-IV) cell groups by AP duration and whether they have a pronounced deflection (hump) on the falling phase (Cabanes et al 2003;Liu et al 2001;Park et al 2009). To identify nociceptive neurons, capsaicin and tetrodotoxin (TTX) are widely combined in the investigation of cell properties to classify cells (Liu et al 2001;Park et al 2009;Veiga Moreira et al 2007). However, the combination is not useful to discriminate capsaicin-insensitive and TTX-sensitive nociceptive cell groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These investigations have been performed in dissociated TG neurons [2628] and in neurons of intact TGs isolated in vitro [29,30] or recorded in vivo in anesthetized mice [31]. In summary, the electrophysiological studies have demonstrated that corneal sensory neurons are either thinly myelinated (Aδ-type) or unmyelinated (C-type) and have heterogeneous passive and active membrane properties [2].…”
Section: Neurobiological Features In Normal/non Dry Eye Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional studies have been performed in trigeminal neurons to better understand their activation and how various corneal nerve injuries may alter their modalities. In vivo electrophysiology works have assessed action potentials from single neurons and/or clusters of neurons in rodent TGs (Lopez de Armentia et al, 2000 ; Veiga Moreira et al, 2007 ; Hirata and Meng, 2010 ; Kurose and Meng, 2013 ; Hirata et al, 2015 ; Quallo et al, 2015 ) under normal and pathological conditions. The literature is not as rich as the one from DRG neurons, but it provides important information about changes in the neuronal properties of corneal neurons under physiological and DE conditions.…”
Section: Molecular and Functional Changes In Trigeminal Corneal Neuromentioning
confidence: 99%