2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-013-0193-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological method to examine muscle fiber architecture in the upper lip in cleft-lip patients

Abstract: Our refined noninvasive electrophysiological method is capable of providing detailed information about muscle fiber architecture and the position, size, and organization of motor units in the lip area. It is thus feasible to conduct further studies to analyze differences in muscle morphology and motor control between surgically treated cleft-lip patients and noncleft individuals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported in previous studies that the orientation and position of the electrodes affects the reproducibility of EMG measurements. Thus, in this study, the positioning of the bipolar electrodes was in accordance with that described in previous studies to allow direct comparison ( 9 , 11 , 34 , 35 ). A recent study documents the optimal placement strategy for monopolar electrodes in the inferior orbicularis oris, but not for the superior oris ( 36 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It has been reported in previous studies that the orientation and position of the electrodes affects the reproducibility of EMG measurements. Thus, in this study, the positioning of the bipolar electrodes was in accordance with that described in previous studies to allow direct comparison ( 9 , 11 , 34 , 35 ). A recent study documents the optimal placement strategy for monopolar electrodes in the inferior orbicularis oris, but not for the superior oris ( 36 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…stands for mathematical expectation. The method has been tested in many different experimental setups [9], [10], [16]- [21], [29], [31], [41], [45], [47] also in moderate dynamic contractions [8], [11], [12], [26], [40] and yielded up to 70 simultaneously active MUs. Furthermore, Pulse-to-Noise (PNR) metric has been proposed in [21] for assessment of accuracy of each individual MU identification.…”
Section: A Ckc-based Identification Of Mu Firing Pattern and Correspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of our algorithm was compared with that of the previously published gCKC algorithm (Table 3) since gCKC was shown to be accurate with different muscle architectures (Holobar et al, 2010; Marateb et al, 2011a; Webster et al, 2016) and different pathological conditions including essential tremor (Gallego et al, 2015a), Parkinson's disease (Holobar et al, 2012), diabetes (Watanabe et al, 2013), after stroke (Li et al, 2015), targeted muscle reinnervation (Farina et al, 2014c), and cleft lip surgery (Radeke et al, 2014). The previously introduced PNR, an efficient objective signal-based metric of gCKC decomposition accuracy (Holobar et al, 2014), was also reported for our decomposition results (Table 2, Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%