Electrophysiological indices of word fragment priming allow characterizing neural stages of speech recognition

Friedrich, Claudia K.; Schild, Ulrike; Röder, Brigitte

doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.012

Cited by 29 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous research suggests that P350 effects for prime-target pairs with a pure semantic or associative relation are absent, since the P350 only indexes orthographic or phonological similarity between prime and target (Friedrich et al, 2004a,b;Friedrich, 2005). On the other hand, previous ERP fragment priming studies without semantically related pairs have shown a central negativity effect following (or co-occurring with) the P350 (Friedrich et al, 2008(Friedrich et al, , 2009. It surfaced as reduced negativity in response to pairs with an orthographic/phonological relation (e.g.…”

Section: Possible Components Indexing Semantic Fragment Primingmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…The behavioral priming in the EEG experiment is therefore similar to the behavioral priming of the pre-test, although every subject saw each target six times in the EEG experiment, but only once in the pre-test. (Friedrich et al, 2004b(Friedrich et al, , 2008(Friedrich et al, , 2009Friedrich, 2005), we defined four regions of interest for the analysis of our data (Fig. 1).…”

Section: Reaction Timesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The electrophysiological assessment of fragment priming has revealed a distinct positive component in the difference wave form resulting from Event Related Potential (ERP) responses to the primed as opposed to the unprimed condition (Friedrich et al, 2004a(Friedrich et al, ,b, 2008(Friedrich et al, , 2009Friedrich, 2005): matching primes (bor-border) elicited less positive responses than mismatching primes (sam-border) at around 350 ms post word onset. This so-called P350 has been interpreted as indexing lexical access and identification/selection, following Marslen-Wilson's (1987) separation of word recognition into the three processes access, selection, and integration.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 2 more Smart Citations

ERP signatures of cross-modal semantic fragment priming: Early context effects in speech perception

Scharinger

Felder

2011

International Journal of Psychophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Possible Components Indexing Semantic Fragment Primingmentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Reaction Timesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

ERP signatures of cross-modal semantic fragment priming: Early context effects in speech perception

Scharinger

Felder

2011

International Journal of Psychophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In contrast, the P350, a positive wave peaking around 350 ms, has been proposed to reflect lexical processing (Friedrich, Kotz, Friederici, & Gunter, 2004;Friedrich, Kotz, Friederici, & Alter, 2004;Friedrich, Schild, & Röder, 2009). According to Friedrich et al (2009), the P350 reflects the activation of modality-independent neural word form representations.…”

Section: Electrophysiological Correlates Of Spoken Word Recognitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Friedrich et al (2009), the P350 reflects the activation of modality-independent neural word form representations. This component has been mainly reported in cross-modal fragment priming but also in auditory and visual unimodal fragment priming.…”

Section: Electrophysiological Correlates Of Spoken Word Recognitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tracking the Time Course of Word‐Frequency Effects in Auditory Word Recognition With Event‐Related Potentials

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the word-frequency effect is one of the most established findings in spoken-word recognition, the precise processing locus of this effect is still a topic of debate. In this study, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to track the time course of the word-frequency effect. In addition, the neighborhood density effect, which is known to reflect mechanisms involved in word identification, was also examined. The ERP data showed a clear frequency effect as early as 350 ms from word onset on the P350, followed by a later effect at word offset on the late N400. A neighborhood density effect was also found at an early stage of spoken-word processing on the PMN, and at word offset on the late N400. Overall, our ERP differences for word frequency suggest that frequency affects the core processes of word identification starting from the initial phase of lexical activation and including target word selection. They thus rule out any interpretation of the word frequency effect that is limited to a purely decisional locus after word identification has been completed.

show abstract

A Common Neural Progression to Meaning in About a Third of a Second

Federmeier¹,

Kutas²,

Dickson³

2016

Neurobiology of Language

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electrophysiological indices of word fragment priming allow characterizing neural stages of speech recognition

Cited by 29 publications

References 51 publications

ERP signatures of cross-modal semantic fragment priming: Early context effects in speech perception

ERP signatures of cross-modal semantic fragment priming: Early context effects in speech perception

Tracking the Time Course of Word‐Frequency Effects in Auditory Word Recognition With Event‐Related Potentials

A Common Neural Progression to Meaning in About a Third of a Second

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About