2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)03160-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological effects of sustained delivery of CRF and its receptor agonists in hippocampal slices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been described that CRH (125–250 nM) increases neuronal excitability (Aldenhoff et al, 1983; Hollrigel et al, 1998; Wang et al, 1998; Sillaber et al, 2002) and enhances activity propagation through the hippocampal formation (von Wolff et al, 2011). In contrast, the application of either lower or higher CRH concentrations resulted in a depression of neuronal activity (Rebaudo et al, 2001). In our experiments we exclusively delivered a CRH concentration of 125 nM and observed enhanced neuronal excitability, in accordance with other studies (Smith and Dudek, 1994; Hollrigel et al, 1998; Blank et al, 2002; Eckart et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been described that CRH (125–250 nM) increases neuronal excitability (Aldenhoff et al, 1983; Hollrigel et al, 1998; Wang et al, 1998; Sillaber et al, 2002) and enhances activity propagation through the hippocampal formation (von Wolff et al, 2011). In contrast, the application of either lower or higher CRH concentrations resulted in a depression of neuronal activity (Rebaudo et al, 2001). In our experiments we exclusively delivered a CRH concentration of 125 nM and observed enhanced neuronal excitability, in accordance with other studies (Smith and Dudek, 1994; Hollrigel et al, 1998; Blank et al, 2002; Eckart et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the hippocampus, it has been proposed that stress associated with a novel environment may impair learning and memory retrieval by saturating the mechanisms that generate glutamate receptor-mediated long-term potentiation (LTP) such that they are limited in their ability to subsequently respond to other stimuli that would normally promote learning (for review, Diamond et al, 2005;Kim et al, 2006;Howland and Wang, 2008;Collingridge et al, 2010). Consistent with this model, CRF has been shown to prevent LTP in the hippocampus (Rebaudo et al, 2001). It is provocative to consider a mirror mechanism by which AAS-dependent increases in CRF at the synapse may 'de-saturate' transmission between the CeA and dlBnST by enhancing GABAergic inhibition, extending the response range in this critical circuit in the extended amygdala and thus allowing the more pronounced expression of sustained fear/anxiety to stressful stimuli that was observed in these animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this enhancement of potentiation of NMDAR EPSCs exhibited a novel pharmacology in cocaine-treated mice, with a requirement for both CRFR1 and CRFR2 and for both PKA and PKC. Many physiological actions of CRF exhibit antagonistic interactions of CRFR1 and CRFR2 (Hillhouse and Grammatopoulos, 2006); however, CRFR1 and CRFR2 can also exhibit additive or more complex interactions (Rebaudo et al, 2001; Hauger et al, 2006; Gao et al, 2008). In the amygdala, CRFR2/PKC mediates a potentiation of glutamate receptor currents, with an additional enhancement after cocaine through the CRFR1/PKA pathway recruited (Pollandt et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%