2020
DOI: 10.3390/pr8080924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological Effects of Extracellular Vesicles Secreted by Cardiosphere-Derived Cells: Unraveling the Antiarrhythmic Properties of Cell Therapies

Abstract: Although cell-based therapies show potential antiarrhythmic effects that could be mediated by their paracrine action, the mechanisms and the extent of these effects were not deeply explored. We investigated the antiarrhythmic mechanisms of extracellular vesicles secreted by cardiosphere-derived cell extracellular vesicles (CDC-EVs) on the electrophysiological properties and gene expression profile of HL1 cardiomyocytes. HL-1 cultures were primed with CDC-EVs or serum-free medium alone for 48 h, followed by opt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different mechanisms, such as immaturity of the electrical phenotypes of the transplanted phenotypes, poor cell-cell coupling and cardiac nerve sprouting, have been proposed as contributors to arrhythmogenic risk after stem cell administration [45]. Despite the proarrhythmic effects that have been attributed to stem cell therapy [46], antiarrhythmic properties have also been reported after mesenchymal stem cell or CDC delivery [47]. In our investigation, however, no statistically significant differences in VT inducibility rates were detected between CON and CDCs-treated animals (both free and encapsulated).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different mechanisms, such as immaturity of the electrical phenotypes of the transplanted phenotypes, poor cell-cell coupling and cardiac nerve sprouting, have been proposed as contributors to arrhythmogenic risk after stem cell administration [45]. Despite the proarrhythmic effects that have been attributed to stem cell therapy [46], antiarrhythmic properties have also been reported after mesenchymal stem cell or CDC delivery [47]. In our investigation, however, no statistically significant differences in VT inducibility rates were detected between CON and CDCs-treated animals (both free and encapsulated).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the combined product, EVs isolated from conditioned medium [6,7] were incorporated into the hydrogels (EVs-PEG-cECMH), observing similar gelation kinetics to hydrogels with PEG (Figure 2a). They also presented reduced lag and gelation time (t 1/2 = 13 ± 3 min) and a higher speed of gelation (slope = 0.022 ± 0.009).…”
Section: Lyophylized Cecm Retained Native Ecm Proteins and Sgagsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…EVs used as therapeutic product were isolated from human CDCs, as previously described [6,7]. Briefly, cardiac biopsies from patients undergoing cardiac surgery were processed to obtain 1-2 mm explants.…”
Section: Edcs Cdcs and Derived Extracellular Vesicle Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some cell products have been characterized for their MoA, but a robust quantification of these effects to compare and identify the most potent cell type for a certain clinical condition, and/or from batch to batch is still lacking [2]. Today is accepted that the cells exert their therapeutic effects mostly through paracrine secretion of soluble factors and/ or extracellular vesicles [16,19,25,26]. Indeed, extracellular vesicles offer the potential to overcome the frailty of cell therapy by conserving their bioactivity regardless of the extremes of handling [27].…”
Section: Disease-targeted and Mechanism Of Action-guided Potency Tests In Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%