2014
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological dynamics reveal distinct processing of stimulus‐stimulus and stimulus‐response conflicts

Abstract: The present study examined electroencephalogram profiles on a novel stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) task in order to elucidate the distinct brain mechanisms of stimulus-stimulus (S-S) and stimulus-response (S-R) conflict processing. The results showed that the SRC effects on reaction times (RTs) and N2 amplitudes were additive when both S-S and S-R conflicts existed. We also observed that, for both RTs and N2 amplitudes, the conflict adaptation effects-the reduced SRC effect following an incongruent tria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
26
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
4
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…demonstrated that also with varying stimulus characteristics, the combination of S-S and S-R conflicts leads to additive effects. Further evidence came from studies that revealed conflict specific trial-sequence-effects910, as well as studies that demonstrated specific effects on different types of conflict resolution in aging111213. However, there are also studies that demonstrated a clear interaction between the Stroop or Flanker paradigm and the Simon task and thus challenge basic assumptions of the DO model1415.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…demonstrated that also with varying stimulus characteristics, the combination of S-S and S-R conflicts leads to additive effects. Further evidence came from studies that revealed conflict specific trial-sequence-effects910, as well as studies that demonstrated specific effects on different types of conflict resolution in aging111213. However, there are also studies that demonstrated a clear interaction between the Stroop or Flanker paradigm and the Simon task and thus challenge basic assumptions of the DO model1415.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, the additive effect of the two conflicts on N2 and early P3 suggested that separate CM modules exist for II and EI conflicts. Numerous data from previous studies also consistently support this conclusion (Folstein & Van Petten, ; Li et al, ; Li et al, ; van Veen & Carter, ; K. Wang et al, ). For example, Li et al () adopted a modified Simon‐spatial Stroop task and found additive effects of the Simon and spatial Stroop conflicts on the RT and N2 components, supporting the distinct processing mechanism of these two kinds of conflicts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For the 1CM1EC model, only one general CM and one general EC exist for all SRC conflicts (Botvinick et al, ; Botvinick, Cohen, & Carter, ). For the 2CM1EC model, two specific CMs exist for different SRC conflicts, whereas only one shared EC exists for all SRC conflicts (Li, Nan, Wang, & Liu, ; Li et al, ; Liu et al, ; K. Wang, Li, Zheng, Wang, & Liu, ; Yang et al, ). For the 2CM2EC model, two specific CMs and two specific ECs exist for two different SRC conflicts (Egner, ; Egner, Delano, & Hirsch, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations