2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.05.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a significant main effect of Trial type was found [F(1.5,53.2) = 20.26, p <.001, ηp 2 = .367]. The post-hoc test revealed that the ERPs were more positive in Repeat and Switch trials compared to Single ones (ps < .001), whereas they did not differ between Repeat and Switch trials (p = .131), in line with the previous study (Tarantino et al, 2016). The Group × Trial type interaction term was not significant [F(2,70) = .15, p = .859)].…”
Section: Switching Tasksupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, a significant main effect of Trial type was found [F(1.5,53.2) = 20.26, p <.001, ηp 2 = .367]. The post-hoc test revealed that the ERPs were more positive in Repeat and Switch trials compared to Single ones (ps < .001), whereas they did not differ between Repeat and Switch trials (p = .131), in line with the previous study (Tarantino et al, 2016). The Group × Trial type interaction term was not significant [F(2,70) = .15, p = .859)].…”
Section: Switching Tasksupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The task was developed by Tarantino and colleagues (Tarantino, Mazzonetto, & Vallesi, 2016; see for details). Stimulus materials consisted of two auditory cue stimuli (tones), two target stimuli (letters), and a fixation asterisk.…”
Section: Switching Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neural processes related to task switching can be studied separately, for example, in relation to the cue, target, or motor response. ERP responses time-locked to the onset of the cue typically show a larger posterior positivity for switch trials than repetition trials as indicated by enhanced cue-related centro-parietal P3-like responses (Barceló, Periáñez, & Knight, 2002;Gajewski & Falkenstein, 2011;Karayanidis et al, 2010;Kieffaber & Hetrick, 2005;Kieffaber, O'Donnell, Shekhar, & Hetrick, 2007;Kopp & Lange, 2013;Lange, Seer, Müller, & Kopp, 2015;Nicholson, Karayanidis, Bumak, Poboka, & Michie, 2006;Nicholson et al, 2005;Tarantino, Mazzonetto, & Vallesi, 2016), and a fronto-central task-novelty P3 response (Barcelo, Escera, Corral, & Periáñez, 2006;Periáñez & Barceló, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in AX-CPT paradigms, a larger probe-locked P3a denotes a better inhibition of prepotent responses (Morales et al 2015). Furthermore, a larger probelocked P3 amplitude in similar cue-probe paradigms (such as task-switching) has been interpreted as reflecting the reactivation of task context and the resolution of the conflict induced by overlearned S-R mapping (Brydges and Barceló 2018;Tarantino et al 2016). Taken together, the modulation of the N2 and P3a components in post-compared to pretraining session suggests that the MBSR group implemented more efficient reactive cognitive control mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%