2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological correlates of rapid auditory and linguistic processing in adolescents with specific language impairment

Abstract: Brief tonal stimuli and spoken sentences were utilized to examine whether adolescents (aged 14;3-18;1) with specific language impairments (SLI) exhibit atypical neural activity for rapid auditory processing of non-linguistic stimuli and linguistic processing of verb-agreement and semantic constraints. Further, we examined whether the behavioral and electrophysiological indices for rapid auditory processing were correlated with those for linguistic processing. Fifteen adolescents with SLI and 15 adolescents wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Neville and colleagues (Neville, Coffey, Holcomb, & Tallal, 1993) reported that N1 to standard tones was reduced at short ISIs over the right hemisphere sites in school-age language-impaired children. A similar finding was also reported for adolescents with SLI (Weber-Fox, Leonard, Hampton Wray, & Tomblin, 2010). Similarly, McArthur and Bishop (Bishop & McArthur, 2004; McArthur & Bishop, 2005) showed that children and young adults with SLI have age-inappropriate ERP components (including N1) to a range of sounds, not just pure tones.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For example, Neville and colleagues (Neville, Coffey, Holcomb, & Tallal, 1993) reported that N1 to standard tones was reduced at short ISIs over the right hemisphere sites in school-age language-impaired children. A similar finding was also reported for adolescents with SLI (Weber-Fox, Leonard, Hampton Wray, & Tomblin, 2010). Similarly, McArthur and Bishop (Bishop & McArthur, 2004; McArthur & Bishop, 2005) showed that children and young adults with SLI have age-inappropriate ERP components (including N1) to a range of sounds, not just pure tones.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For example, Benasich et al (2006) found that the latency of the N250 (the component preceding the auditory mismatch response in infants) at 6 months predicted expressive and receptive language abilities of at-risk children at 24 months. Weber-Fox and colleagues (2010) found that the auditory P3 amplitude was weakly to moderately related to the amplitude of a different neural response to verb agreement violations in adolescents with DLD. Taken together, these studies warrant further investigation of the functional role of pre-attentive and attentional auditory and phonological processing and discrimination components in the atypical language development in DLD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Christine Weber-Fox and associates (Weber-Fox, Leonard, Wray, Tomblin & 2010) analyzed neuronal activity in 15 persons ranging in age from 14 to 18 years with a childhood diagnosis of SLI, and found that the potentials evoked by grammatical language tasks are atypical in many adolescents with SLI, as opposed to the potentials for nonverbal tasks.…”
Section: The Causes Of Slimentioning
confidence: 99%