2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological correlates of processing facial attractiveness and its influence on cooperative behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
66
2
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
66
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in keeping with findings reporting a greater LPC for attractive faces (Chen et al, 2012;Johnston & Oliver-Rodriguez, 1997;Marzi & Viggiano, 2010;Oliver-Rodríguez, Guan, & Johnston, 1999;Schacht, Werheid, & Sommer, 2008;Werheid, Schacht, & Sommer, 2007;Zhang et al, 2011). For example, Johnston and Oliver-Rodriguez (1997) observed an LPC in male viewers viewing female (but not male) faces that were manipulated to enhance attractiveness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in keeping with findings reporting a greater LPC for attractive faces (Chen et al, 2012;Johnston & Oliver-Rodriguez, 1997;Marzi & Viggiano, 2010;Oliver-Rodríguez, Guan, & Johnston, 1999;Schacht, Werheid, & Sommer, 2008;Werheid, Schacht, & Sommer, 2007;Zhang et al, 2011). For example, Johnston and Oliver-Rodriguez (1997) observed an LPC in male viewers viewing female (but not male) faces that were manipulated to enhance attractiveness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…ERP studies of facial attractiveness have reported the presence of P1, N1 and P2 modulations. Some researchers have provided evidence that the P2 is the earliest component sensitive to attractive and unattractive faces (Chen et al, 2012;Van Hooff, Crawford, & van Vugt, 2011). Others have reported earlier modulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies demonstrated that the attractiveness level affected participants' judgments in face tasks. Compared to less attractive people, attractive people are often physically healthier (Shackelford & Larsen, 1999), more likely to be remembered (Marzi & Viggiano, 2010), more likely to be imitated (Matthijs, Veling, Baaren, & Dijksterhuis, 2009), more likely to be trusted (Wilson & Eckel, 2006), more likely to find opportunities to cooperate with others (Chen et al, 2012), higher in levels of self-confidence and self-esteem, and able to get more jobs with higher salaries (Langlois et al, 2000). Based on these results, people seem to put less attention and resources into less attractive faces in tasks which might influence further judgments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En la misma línea del estudio arriba mencionado, se ha encontrado que los rostros altamente atractivos provocan un componente positivo temprano en zonas frontales, y que existe una modulación del componente N170 en el siguiente orden: mayor modulación ante los rostros altamente atractivos, seguido por los juzgados como medianamente atractivos, los juzgados con bajo atractivo y con menor amplitud los rostros no atractivos (Marzi & Viggiano, 2010). Chen et al (2012), estudiaron la influencia del atractivo facial en el procesamiento cortical para estos estímulos, encontrando que los rostros atractivos provocaron una mayor amplitud del componente N2 y menores amplitudes del componente tardío (CPT).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified