2004
DOI: 10.1177/108925320400800205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiologic Monitoring during Surgery to Repair the Thoracoabdominal Aorta

Abstract: The repair of aneurysms and dissections that involve the thoracoabdominal aorta represent a major stress to the cardiovascular surgery team because of the feared complication of paraplegia. Here, the etiology of this complication is explained through a description of the relevant surgical anatomy and characteristics of hemodynamic support. In addition, recent advances in the neurophysiologic assessment of the descending motor pathways and their application to perioperative monitoring are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…36 Furthermore, MEPs may be more sensitive to ischemia than SSEPs and less likely to deteriorate after midline myelotomy, unlike SSEPs. 4,5,7,10,12,24,[34][35][36]40 Also, as demonstrated in this case, not only will MEPs often be present in neurologically compromised patients, 9 but they may also be able to detect subclinical deficits, 3,23,38 whereas SSEPs are significantly more likely to be absent in the normal and compromised neurological states. In a recent prospective trial, 38.7% of patients undergoing a variety of spinal procedures had either significantly diminished or absent tibial SSEPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…36 Furthermore, MEPs may be more sensitive to ischemia than SSEPs and less likely to deteriorate after midline myelotomy, unlike SSEPs. 4,5,7,10,12,24,[34][35][36]40 Also, as demonstrated in this case, not only will MEPs often be present in neurologically compromised patients, 9 but they may also be able to detect subclinical deficits, 3,23,38 whereas SSEPs are significantly more likely to be absent in the normal and compromised neurological states. In a recent prospective trial, 38.7% of patients undergoing a variety of spinal procedures had either significantly diminished or absent tibial SSEPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Ischemic insults during the intraoperative or postoperative periods can result from intraoperative hypotension, blood loss, the loss of critical intercostal arteries that are occluded or intentionally sacrificed during repair, aortic cross-clamping, or increased intracerebral pressure. Failure to prevent or rapidly detect spinal cord ischemia frequently results in permanent paraplegia, which can occur rapidly and depends on the severity of the loss of perfusion (Katz et al 1981;Livesay et al 1985;Connolly 1998;McGarvey et al 2007;Sloan and Jameson 2007). Surgical and anesthetic attempts to prevent paralysis include Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest (DHCA), epidural spinal cooling, elevation in MAP (mean arterial pressure), removal of CSF with a lumbar drain, augmentation of distal aortic perfusion using partial bypass, intercostal artery re-implantation, and adjunct pharmacologic measures (Gloviczki 2002).…”
Section: Detection Of Intraoperative Ischemia During Thoracic Aneurysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die verzöger ten Defizite entstehen nicht nur durch ei ne instabile Hämodynamik, sondern auch durch Ödembildung im Rückenmarkbe reich und Embolisierung oder Throm bosierung der reanastomosierten Arte rien [37,38]. Allerdings ist es schwer, den genauen Zeitpunkt der Entstehung eines neurologischen Defizits und die Fakto ren, die dazu beigetragen haben, zu be stimmen.…”
Section: Postoperativ Auftretende Neurologische Defiziteunclassified