2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophoretically mediated partial coalescence of a charged microdrop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results include computations of tip streaming drops. Related numerical work includes [43][44][45]. A strong motivation for theoretical and numerical analysis of the electrokinetic models is their significance in microfluidic devices, for which electrokinetic techniques have been among the most important methods for the manipulation of drops and bubbles [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results include computations of tip streaming drops. Related numerical work includes [43][44][45]. A strong motivation for theoretical and numerical analysis of the electrokinetic models is their significance in microfluidic devices, for which electrokinetic techniques have been among the most important methods for the manipulation of drops and bubbles [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dynamic collisions the viscosity of the continuous phase becomes an important parameter [53,54]. Other important quantities that can affect dynamic drop and bubble coalescence are the presence of free charge, and in some practical applications the application of external electric fields [55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is that balance that explains the emergence of the electric Bond number qE/𝛾a 0 . (Pillai et al 2017) and (Hamlin et al 2012) agree as far as the relevance of this parameter is concerned, but they report different scaling exponents. Our scaling exponent agrees with that of (Hamlin et al 2012), but an important difference to both papers is that in our case q is the average between daughter and parent droplet charge, whereas both works referred to define q as the daughter droplet charge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Still, there are some similarities in the results. Roughly, in (Pillai et al 2017), the partial coalescence mechanism is described as a competition between electrostatic and capillary forces. When a droplet approaches the meniscus, it is already polarized by the electric field, where the part of the droplet that faces the meniscus (the "south pole") carries charges of a sign opposite to that of the charges at the meniscus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation