1958
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1958.tb06034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophoretic Studies of the Prower Factor; a Blood Coagulation Factor which differs from Factor VII

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that Factor X is required for thc clotting of whole blood by venom, because the 'Stypven' clotting time is long in blood from cases of the Stuart-Prower dcfcct (Hougic, 1956;Denson, 1958). If, as is suggested here, the venom reacts specifically with Factor X, then the conversion ofplasnia Factor X into an active product is probably the first stage in the coagulant action of the venom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It is likely that Factor X is required for thc clotting of whole blood by venom, because the 'Stypven' clotting time is long in blood from cases of the Stuart-Prower dcfcct (Hougic, 1956;Denson, 1958). If, as is suggested here, the venom reacts specifically with Factor X, then the conversion ofplasnia Factor X into an active product is probably the first stage in the coagulant action of the venom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Factor X was discovered by the study of two patients with a congenital bleeding tendency. Miss Audrey Prower (Fig 4) was 22‐year‐old when she was admitted to University College Hospital in London in 1956 for investigation of a bleeding tendency prior to a dental extraction (Telfer et al , 1956; Denson, 1957). She had a significant past medical history, including significant bleeding after two previous dental extractions in 1939 and 1945.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetically, it is also thought to be transferred as an autosomal recessive. Denson (1958) made a cross-matching test of the plasma from cases of Prower defect and Stuart defect and found no correction, leading them to conclude that they are due to the same factor defect. Furthermore, they maintain that the report of Telfer et al (1956) using RVV (which came to contradictory conclusions) is incorrect due to the technical errors.…”
Section: Hemostatic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%