2002
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.29920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophoretic pattern of concentrated urine: Comparison between 24-hour collection and random samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…29,30 However, the collection of samples is cumbersome and inconvenient for the patient, leading to poor compliance, [7][8][9] and the laboratory treatment of the samples varies and can be laborious. 31,32 In addition, the excretion of BJP is affected by kidney function, and electrophoretic methods for quantifying the monoclonal protein in urine from patients with plasma cell dyscrasias can be insensitive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 However, the collection of samples is cumbersome and inconvenient for the patient, leading to poor compliance, [7][8][9] and the laboratory treatment of the samples varies and can be laborious. 31,32 In addition, the excretion of BJP is affected by kidney function, and electrophoretic methods for quantifying the monoclonal protein in urine from patients with plasma cell dyscrasias can be insensitive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from plasma via glomerular filtration, from renal tubular epithelial cells, from shedding of whole cells or membrane fragments along the tubulus and bladder or from exosome secretion [30,34]. According to recent recommendations for urinary proteomics [33], we collected second morning urine samples and added sodium azide instantly to minimise contamination of proteins from bacteria [3], which can change the urinary proteome profile [33]. We also removed cells and debris by centrifugation, and removed salts from urine samples by dialysis against water [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For absolute quantification, a 24-h urine collection would be desirable. However, it is probably impractical to carry out quantitative collections for most biomarker discovery and validation studies because of low patient compliance and a history of unreliable results (51). An appropriate alternative is to collect spot urine samples and normalize the biomarker concentration by the creatinine concentration.…”
Section: Fig 4 Diagram Of Procedures For "Non-labeling" Protein Quanmentioning
confidence: 99%