Abstract:The electrophoretic mobilities and catalytic rates of individual molecules of bovine intestinal alkaline phosphatase were determined in CHES and borate buffers of identical pH using a capillary electrophoresis based method. Both properties were found to be heterogeneous. In the presence of CHES, the mobility and rate were found to be −1.9 ± 0.2 × 10−9 m2 V−1 s−1 and 9.8 ± 7.4 × 104 min−1 ( N = 38), respectively. In the presence of borate, the mobility and rate were found to be −6.9 ± 0.5 × 10−9 m2 V−1 s−1 and … Show more
“…The Winzor model [2] used suggested that the variance in mobility of the unmodified enzyme could be attributed to relatively small difference in size and effective charge. This is consistent with other studies [13][14][15]. The model gave plausible results for the prediction of changes in size, shape, and charge required to accompany the changes in observed mobilities of -galactosidase caused by labelling.…”
“…Previous studies have suggested that the observed heterogeneity in electrophoretic mobility of individual enzyme molecules may result from relatively small differences in shape, size, and charge [13][14][15]. In order to assess this, -galactosidase was subjected to relatively small changes in its size, shape and charge through chemical modification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positions of the product peaks in the resultant electropherogram were used to calculate the distance travelled by the enzyme molecules during the 360 s separation period. From this, their electrophoretic mobilities were calculated [15].…”
Escherichia coli β-galactosidase was labelled with 1 mM fluorescein 5-carbamoylmethylthiopropanoic N-hydroxysuccinimidyl ester for 1 and 3 min. The samples were separated by capillary electrophoresis and peak areas compared to standards of label after attachment of BSA in order to determine the concentration of attached label. Enzyme concentration in the samples was determined by single molecule counting. The average number of labels attached to each molecule of enzyme was found to be 3.1 and 4.5. The distribution of single enzyme molecule electrophoretic mobilities for the unlabelled enzyme and that labelled for 1 and 3 minutes were measured using capillary electrophoresis. The average mobilities were found determined to be -1.99x10− 8 m2V− 1s− 1 ± 1.3x10− 9 m2V− 1s− 1 (N = 39), -2.16 x10− 8 m2V− 1s− 1 ± 1.9x10− 9 m2V− 1s− 1 (N = 46), and − 2.18 x10− 8 m2V− 1s− 1 ± 2.1x10− 9 (N = 39) respectively. A protein electrophoresis model was applied and predicted that the differences in average mobilities could be explained through relatively minor changes in overall charge, Stokes radius, and shape. This difference was similar to the range in mobilities observed in the unlabelled protein. This is consistent with the electrophoretic heterogeneity of the unmodified enzyme being caused by relatively small differences in charge, size, and shape of the individual molecules in the population.
“…The Winzor model [2] used suggested that the variance in mobility of the unmodified enzyme could be attributed to relatively small difference in size and effective charge. This is consistent with other studies [13][14][15]. The model gave plausible results for the prediction of changes in size, shape, and charge required to accompany the changes in observed mobilities of -galactosidase caused by labelling.…”
“…Previous studies have suggested that the observed heterogeneity in electrophoretic mobility of individual enzyme molecules may result from relatively small differences in shape, size, and charge [13][14][15]. In order to assess this, -galactosidase was subjected to relatively small changes in its size, shape and charge through chemical modification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positions of the product peaks in the resultant electropherogram were used to calculate the distance travelled by the enzyme molecules during the 360 s separation period. From this, their electrophoretic mobilities were calculated [15].…”
Escherichia coli β-galactosidase was labelled with 1 mM fluorescein 5-carbamoylmethylthiopropanoic N-hydroxysuccinimidyl ester for 1 and 3 min. The samples were separated by capillary electrophoresis and peak areas compared to standards of label after attachment of BSA in order to determine the concentration of attached label. Enzyme concentration in the samples was determined by single molecule counting. The average number of labels attached to each molecule of enzyme was found to be 3.1 and 4.5. The distribution of single enzyme molecule electrophoretic mobilities for the unlabelled enzyme and that labelled for 1 and 3 minutes were measured using capillary electrophoresis. The average mobilities were found determined to be -1.99x10− 8 m2V− 1s− 1 ± 1.3x10− 9 m2V− 1s− 1 (N = 39), -2.16 x10− 8 m2V− 1s− 1 ± 1.9x10− 9 m2V− 1s− 1 (N = 46), and − 2.18 x10− 8 m2V− 1s− 1 ± 2.1x10− 9 (N = 39) respectively. A protein electrophoresis model was applied and predicted that the differences in average mobilities could be explained through relatively minor changes in overall charge, Stokes radius, and shape. This difference was similar to the range in mobilities observed in the unlabelled protein. This is consistent with the electrophoretic heterogeneity of the unmodified enzyme being caused by relatively small differences in charge, size, and shape of the individual molecules in the population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.