2013
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-97072013000400031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ELECTROOXIDATION OF 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL ON GLASSY CARBON ELECTRODES MODIFIED WITH COMPOSITE Ni(OH)2-Co(OH)2 FILMS

Abstract: Glassy carbon electrodes coated with a film of electrodeposited cobalt and nickel hydroxides were prepared in order to determine its activity to the 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) oxidation. The modified electrodes were characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Scan Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS). The results indicate that both hydroxides are homogeneously distributed in the electrode surf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most intense ∼530.9 eV peak is characteristic of a metal Co–OH bond, and the binding energy at ∼529.5 eV is a characteristic of a metalO double bond that may be due to CoOOH possibly formed by air oxidation of Co­(OH) 2 , particularly during the synthesis. Mostly, the peak at ∼532.4 eV is related to the adsorbed water during the synthesis process . During the discharge process, a peak at ∼531.0 eV appears in the high-voltage region, which corresponds to LiOH, ,, formed by conversion reaction, and a Li 2 O peak (∼528.6 eV) , and a Li 2 CO 3 peak (∼532 eV) arise in the low-voltage region due to reaction products derived from a combination of hydride formation between LiOH and lithium and side reactions with electrolyte.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most intense ∼530.9 eV peak is characteristic of a metal Co–OH bond, and the binding energy at ∼529.5 eV is a characteristic of a metalO double bond that may be due to CoOOH possibly formed by air oxidation of Co­(OH) 2 , particularly during the synthesis. Mostly, the peak at ∼532.4 eV is related to the adsorbed water during the synthesis process . During the discharge process, a peak at ∼531.0 eV appears in the high-voltage region, which corresponds to LiOH, ,, formed by conversion reaction, and a Li 2 O peak (∼528.6 eV) , and a Li 2 CO 3 peak (∼532 eV) arise in the low-voltage region due to reaction products derived from a combination of hydride formation between LiOH and lithium and side reactions with electrolyte.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly, the peak at ∼532.4 eV is related to the adsorbed water during the synthesis process. 88 During the discharge process, a peak at ∼531.0 eV appears in the high-voltage region, which corresponds to LiOH, 79,80,82 formed by conversion reaction, and a Li 2 O peak (∼528.6 eV) 79,82 and a Li 2 CO 3 peak (∼532 eV) 83 arise in the low-voltage region due to reaction products derived from a combination of hydride formation between LiOH and lithium and side reactions with electrolyte. From all these results, the overall reaction mechanism of CS-Co(OH) 2 is summarized in Figure 10, and the lithiation of CS-Co(OH) 2 can be described by the following processes: reversibility of conversion and hydride formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peaks of Co 2p 3/2 and Co 2p 1/2 were located at 781.1 and 796.9 eV, respectively, , along with the presence of the two strong satellite peaks of cobalt at 784.9 and 802.2 eV, representing the oxidation state of cobalt ion as +2 (Figure ). Furthermore, no difference in Co 2p spectra was observed, indicating that the cobalt oxidation number was not changed during fabrication process. The results show the coordination network between cobalt ion and H 2 TCPP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…17,18 In contrast, the electroanalytical methods got a clear edge over the conventional analytical methods in terms of high sensitivity, fast response, low cost, miniaturization, and most importantly, in-situ analysis. 19−21 Until now, different electrochemical sensors have been reported for the detection of 2,4,6 TCP such as HS-β-cyclodextrin, 22 graphene-bromocresol purple, 23 composite sensor based on rhodamine B/platinum nanoparticles/carbon nanotubes, 24 film composite of Ni-(OH) 2 −Co(OH) 2 , 25 and SWCNTs/poly-3,4-ethylenedioxothiophen. 26 However, the electrochemical activity of 2,4,6 TCP is very weak, and it requires a large amount of activation energy that results in poor sensitivity.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several traditional analytical methods reported for the quantification of CPs in the environmental samples, for example, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, high performance-liquid chromatography, and capillary electrophoresis. , Surely, these analytical methods offer influential trace analysis and can detect CPs at very low concentration levels. However, there are certain serious factors that limit the practices of these analytical tools, as these techniques require tedious sample treatment, extensive purification, expensive equipment, and demand well-qualified personnel. , In contrast, the electroanalytical methods got a clear edge over the conventional analytical methods in terms of high sensitivity, fast response, low cost, miniaturization, and most importantly, in-situ analysis. Until now, different electrochemical sensors have been reported for the detection of 2,4,6 TCP such as HS-β-cyclodextrin, graphene-bromocresol purple, composite sensor based on rhodamine B/platinum nanoparticles/carbon nanotubes, film composite of Ni­(OH) 2 –Co­(OH) 2 , and SWCNTs/poly-3,4-ethylenedioxothiophen . However, the electrochemical activity of 2,4,6 TCP is very weak, and it requires a large amount of activation energy that results in poor sensitivity. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%