2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-005x.2009.00228.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic surveillance in the global workplace: laws, ethics, research and practice

Abstract: This paper considers the legal, ethical and cultural factors that must be addressed in evaluating the appropriateness of employing electronic surveillance (ES) in varying international contexts. It critically evaluates the rationale that underlies the use of ES in a variety of settings and types of organisations. It suggests guidelines for the adoption and use of ES and potential directions for future research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while surveillance has long been recognised as part of the ‘armoury’ of managerial practices in the workplace (Thompson ), the digitisation of surveillance technologies, in workplaces and elsewhere, has meant that information is now far more amendable to storage, transmission and computation and more easily deposited, sorted, classified and retrieved, than analogue methods (Introna and Wood ; Norris and Armstrong ). Hence, employers can now watch employees via CCTV, record telephone calls, monitor office conversations and computer screens, log key strokes, and pinpoint the whereabouts of an individual in a building or company car (Kidwell and Sprague ; Martin et al . ).…”
Section: Sources Of Contestation Related To Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while surveillance has long been recognised as part of the ‘armoury’ of managerial practices in the workplace (Thompson ), the digitisation of surveillance technologies, in workplaces and elsewhere, has meant that information is now far more amendable to storage, transmission and computation and more easily deposited, sorted, classified and retrieved, than analogue methods (Introna and Wood ; Norris and Armstrong ). Hence, employers can now watch employees via CCTV, record telephone calls, monitor office conversations and computer screens, log key strokes, and pinpoint the whereabouts of an individual in a building or company car (Kidwell and Sprague ; Martin et al . ).…”
Section: Sources Of Contestation Related To Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPM technology thus improves human resource management by providing accurate, consistent and impartial methods of collecting performance information. The argument is also that the technology can protect employee health and safety and guard the company against abuse of resources and potential liability by monitoring behaviours of workers, customers and other visitors to the workplace as well as the overall work environment (Kallman, 1993; Wood, 1998; Kidwell and Sprague, 2009). Kidwell and Sprague (2009) point out that sellers of electronic surveillance systems market their wares by focusing on the ability of the systems to deliver productivity improvements by providing more exact measures of output, lower costs by reducing the ability of employees to engage in slacking behaviours and lower levels of liability, accidents and theft through the use of video surveillance.…”
Section: Ideas About Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Privacy protection laws tend to restrict the improper dissemination of personal information to unauthorized people (Kidwell, Sprague, 2009). A consistent pattern among the three Baltic States is to have a corporate entity to provide a warning of some kind before giving out private information to a third party (in general).…”
Section: Privacy Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%