1996
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/29/5/026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic surface properties of alkali-metal alloys

Abstract: A generalization of the stabilized jellium model (Perdew et al 1990, Phys. Rev. B 42 11 627) to random alkali-metal alloys is given and applied to calculations of the surface energy and the work function changes due to the concentration in the presence of surface segregation. The calculated variations in surface energy and work function against the concentration of the constituents are in good agreement with measurements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that because of the scarcity of rel evant data, Fomenko [7] even used the value of the lithium EWF taken from a reference book of a chemist [16]. Regretfully, investigations into the emissivity and EWF of lithium and its alloys have not considerably advanced since then [6,9,11,14,17[. With this in mind, in this article we review the state of the art in experimental research on the lithium EWF, including the works of the authors.…”
Section: State Of the Art In Investigations Of The Lithium Electron Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that because of the scarcity of rel evant data, Fomenko [7] even used the value of the lithium EWF taken from a reference book of a chemist [16]. Regretfully, investigations into the emissivity and EWF of lithium and its alloys have not considerably advanced since then [6,9,11,14,17[. With this in mind, in this article we review the state of the art in experimental research on the lithium EWF, including the works of the authors.…”
Section: State Of the Art In Investigations Of The Lithium Electron Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 The reason is the larger atomic-size mismatch in K-Cs compared to Rb-Cs. Moreover, the heats of formation for Rb-Cs are negative suggesting the existence of a mixed alloy instead of phase separation.…”
Section: B Structural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical and experimental studies on surface properties of bulk K-Cs and Rb-Cs alloys suggest that while surface segregation is present for K-Cs alloys, it does not occur in Rb-Cs alloys. 40 Moreover, whereas for K-Cs the heats of formation are positive indicating segregation behavior, for Rb-Cs they are negative, suggesting perfect mixing. 41 Considering this, we found it interesting to study if and how the miscibility properties change in these alloy clusters compared to those of bulk alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%