2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.65.165418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structures of capped carbon nanotubes under electric fields

Abstract: We have investigated the electronic structure of capped carbon nanotubes under electric fields by density functional calculations. The calculated effective work function of the capped armchair nanotubes decreases linearly with increasing electric fields, whereas that of the metal tip decreases quadratically. We analyzed the density of states, highest occupied molecular orbitals ͑HOMO's͒ and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals ͑LUMO's͒ for various charged states under electric fields. While the HOMO and the LU… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, if the tip is moved towards the sample, first the à 1 orbital and then the à 2 orbital should be detected, as predicted by theory. At closer distances the electric field of the tip causes the shift of these orbitals to lower energies as reported also for other -conjugated systems [23,24]. Furthermore, the isosurface plots show a location of the à 1 orbital direct at the copper surface, explaining that no detection is possible within the current window of experiment.…”
Section: Prl 105 066801 (2010) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Esupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Accordingly, if the tip is moved towards the sample, first the à 1 orbital and then the à 2 orbital should be detected, as predicted by theory. At closer distances the electric field of the tip causes the shift of these orbitals to lower energies as reported also for other -conjugated systems [23,24]. Furthermore, the isosurface plots show a location of the à 1 orbital direct at the copper surface, explaining that no detection is possible within the current window of experiment.…”
Section: Prl 105 066801 (2010) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Esupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The Fermi level energy is approximately middle of energy gap and work function is defined as the energy difference between the Fermi level energy and the LUMO [11] which is important in field emission applications. For the configuration, the Fermi level energy (E FL ) is increased from -4.49 eV in the Table 1 Adsorption energy of acetone on Al 12 N 12 (E ad ), HOMO energies (E HOMO ), LUMO energies (E LUMO ), HOMO-LUMO energy gap (E g ), Fermi level energy (E FL ), and work function (U) for the pristine and acetone/Al 12 N 12 complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work function is defined as the energy difference between the Fermi level energy and the LUMO. 15 For the configurations, work function is decreased from 3.43 eV in the pristine B 12 N 12 nanocage to 3.30, 3.26, and 3.09 eV in configurations A, B, and C, respectively ( Table 1). The results show that the field emission properties of the configurations are facilitated upon urea adsorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%