2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2006.02.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of oxidized SiC(0001) studied by inverse photoemission spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental values for the gap are 2.0 eV for 6H-SiC(0001) √ 3 × √ 3 [19,23] and 1.0 eV [22] or 1.2 eV [24] for 6H-SiC(0001)3 × 3. Recently, a value of U = 2.2 ± 0.2 eV has been derived for 4H-SiC(0001) √ 3 × √ 3 [44]. The values of U may also be estimated from the Coulomb repulsion and the screening response to charge transfers.…”
Section: Mott-hubbard Picture and Quasi-particle Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental values for the gap are 2.0 eV for 6H-SiC(0001) √ 3 × √ 3 [19,23] and 1.0 eV [22] or 1.2 eV [24] for 6H-SiC(0001)3 × 3. Recently, a value of U = 2.2 ± 0.2 eV has been derived for 4H-SiC(0001) √ 3 × √ 3 [44]. The values of U may also be estimated from the Coulomb repulsion and the screening response to charge transfers.…”
Section: Mott-hubbard Picture and Quasi-particle Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(a)), UPS shows photoemission from surface states all the way up to the Fermi level (E F ). Surface states in the band gap of SiC of this nature have been previously observed in several photoemission studies of 6H-SiC (0001) surfaces [29][30][31][32][33]. These studies combined with our prior studies of hydrogen desorption from (0001)/(111) SiC surfaces [18] have shown that these surface states are attributable to surface Si-Si bonds arising due to the presence of Si adatoms on the (0001)/(111) SiC surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%