2022
DOI: 10.3390/atoms10020048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Structure of Lr+ (Z = 103) from Ab Initio Calculations

Abstract: The four-component relativistic Dirac–Coulomb Hamiltonian and the multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) model were used to provide the reliable energy levels and spectroscopic properties of the Lr+ ion and the Lu+ homolog. The energy spectrum of Lr+ is very similar to that of the Lu+ homolog, with the multiplet manifold of the 7s2, 6d17s1 and 7s17p1 configurations as the ground and low-lying excited states. The results are discussed in light of earlier findings utilizing different theoretical models.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…c Combined configuration interaction/many-body perturbation theory calculations with DCB Hamiltonian using numerical SCF spinors [106], QED is included via the model potential of Flambaum et al [27]. d All-electron GAS-CI calculations with Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian, n = 1-3 and 4s4p shells were kept frozen [107], QED [108] and Breit corrections were estimated at the MCDF level. e Configuration interaction calculations with DCB Hamiltonian using numerical SCF spinors [109], QED is included via the model potential of Flambaum et al [27].…”
Section: Lutetium Cation Lu +mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…c Combined configuration interaction/many-body perturbation theory calculations with DCB Hamiltonian using numerical SCF spinors [106], QED is included via the model potential of Flambaum et al [27]. d All-electron GAS-CI calculations with Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian, n = 1-3 and 4s4p shells were kept frozen [107], QED [108] and Breit corrections were estimated at the MCDF level. e Configuration interaction calculations with DCB Hamiltonian using numerical SCF spinors [109], QED is included via the model potential of Flambaum et al [27].…”
Section: Lutetium Cation Lu +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can argue that the presence of the closed 4f shell leads to strong angular correlations which have to be thoroughly accounted for to achieve accuracy of order $100 cm À1 for dstates. This circumstance can be of crucial importance for highly accurate predictions of atomic energy levels of lutetium's heavier homolog, lawrencium [5,106,107,110].…”
Section: Lutetium Cation Lu +mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, various numerical approaches, such as multi-configuration Hartree-Dirac Fock (MCDHF), Fock-space coupled-cluster (FSCC), and configuration-interaction (CI), are constantly being developed to provide reliable predictions for ever more complex systems [22][23][24]. Only recently has progress been made in the ab initio framework, such that the atomic properties and spectra of actinium (Ac, Z = 89) [25], fermium (Fm, Z = 100) [26], mendelevium (Md, Z = 101) [27], lawrencium (Lr, Z = 103) [28][29][30], rutherfordium (Rf, Z = 104) [31,32], and dubnium (Db, Z = 105) [33] can be calculated with a relatively high degree of reliability.…”
Section: Atomic Structure Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is generally applicable for transition-metal ions including Lu + and Lr + . Promising optical pumping schemes for singly charged rutherfordium, the next-heavier element within the fourth row transition metals, have already been proposed [33]. Compared to many existing spectroscopy techniques, the LRC approach has a number of key advantages, some of which are:…”
Section: Experimental Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%