The performance of
several standard and popular approaches for
calculating X-ray absorption spectra at the carbon, nitrogen, and
oxygen K-edges of 40 primarily organic molecules up to the size of
guanine has been evaluated, focusing on the low-energy and intense
1s → π* transitions. Using results obtained with CVS-ADC(2)-x
and fc-CVS-EOM-CCSD as benchmark references, we investigate the performance
of CC2, ADC(2), ADC(3/2), and commonly adopted density functional
theory (DFT)-based approaches. Here, focus is on
precision
rather than on
accuracy
of transition energies
and intensities—in other words, we target relative energies
and intensities and the spread thereof, rather than absolute values.
The use of exchange–correlation functionals tailored for time-dependent
DFT calculations of core excitations leads to error spreads similar
to those seen for more standard functionals, despite yielding superior
absolute energies. Long-range corrected functionals are shown to perform
particularly well compared to our reference data, showing error spreads
in energy and intensity of 0.2–0.3 eV and ∼10%, respectively,
as compared to 0.3–0.6 eV and ∼20% for a typical pure
hybrid. In comparing intensities, state mixing can complicate matters,
and techniques to avoid this issue are discussed. Furthermore, the
influence of basis sets in high-level
ab initio
calculations
is investigated, showing that reasonably accurate results are obtained
with the use of 6-311++G**. We name this benchmark suite as XABOOM
(X-ray absorption benchmark of organic molecules) and provide molecular
structures and ground-state self-consistent field energies and spectroscopic
data. We believe that it provides a good assessment of electronic
structure theory methods for calculating X-ray absorption spectra
and will become useful for future developments in this field.