2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Structure and Multicatalytic Features of Redox-Active Bis(arylimino)acenaphthene (BIAN)-Derived Ruthenium Complexes

Abstract: The article examines the newly designed and structurally characterized redox-active BIAN-derived [Ru(trpy)(R-BIAN)Cl]ClO4 ([1a]ClO4-[1c]ClO4), [Ru(trpy)(R-BIAN)(H2O)](ClO4)2 ([3a](ClO4)2-[3c](ClO4)2), and BIAO-derived [Ru(trpy)(BIAO)Cl]ClO4 ([2a]ClO4) (trpy = 2,2':6',2''-terpyridine, R-BIAN = bis(arylimino)acenaphthene (R = H (1a(+), 3a(2+)), 4-OMe (1b(+), 3b(2+)), 4-NO2 (1c(+), 3c(2+)), BIAO = [N-(phenyl)imino]acenapthenone). The experimental (X-ray, (1)H NMR, spectroelectrochemistry, EPR) and DFT/TD-DFT calc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the influence of the redox‐active ligand scaffold resulted in unusual bond lengths for the carbon–nitrogen and the amino–ruthenium bonds, a result consistent with our initial hypothesis. The Ru–N1 and Ru–N2 distances are within the range of values reported for anionic nitrogen‐based ligands (2.03 Å complex II vs. 1.97 Å literature) [32] . Accordingly, we observe elongation of the C−N bonds (1.28 Å literature vs. 1.36 Å complex II ) when compared to imine bond lengths, as well as the shortening of the C−C bond (1.51 Å literature vs. 1.40 Å complex II ) towards a range more typical for an alkene bond.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the influence of the redox‐active ligand scaffold resulted in unusual bond lengths for the carbon–nitrogen and the amino–ruthenium bonds, a result consistent with our initial hypothesis. The Ru–N1 and Ru–N2 distances are within the range of values reported for anionic nitrogen‐based ligands (2.03 Å complex II vs. 1.97 Å literature) [32] . Accordingly, we observe elongation of the C−N bonds (1.28 Å literature vs. 1.36 Å complex II ) when compared to imine bond lengths, as well as the shortening of the C−C bond (1.51 Å literature vs. 1.40 Å complex II ) towards a range more typical for an alkene bond.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Them ononuclear nature and the vacant coordination site resulted in ah igh air-a nd moisture-sensitive behavior, with the compound decomposing within seconds when exposed to air.I nterestingly,t he influence of the redox-active ligand scaffold resulted in unusual bond lengths for the carbonnitrogen and the amino-ruthenium bonds,aresult consistent with our initial hypothesis.T he Ru-N1 and Ru-N2 distances are within the range of values reported for anionic nitrogenbased ligands (2.03 complex II vs.1 .97 literature). [32] Accordingly,w eo bserve elongation of the CÀNb onds (1.28 literature vs.1 .36 complex II)w hen compared to imine bond lengths,aswell as the shortening of the C À Cbond (1.51 literature vs.1.40 complex II)towards arange more typical for an alkene bond. Thes olid-state structure of complex I and II clearly supports an ambiguous oxidation state at the Ru-center (Supporting Information, Figures S2, S3).…”
Section: Forschungsartikelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Single crystals of both the Ru II and Ru III species were obtained and their structures are shown in Figure B and C, respectively. Complex 2 II displays the typical slightly distorted octahedral geometry around the ruthenium, as expected for a low‐spin d 6 Ru II ion . The bpy ligands occupy both the axial and equatorial positions assuming the κ‐N 1 O 1 ‐pdc 2− ligands bound in the equatorial plane, with a dangling carboxylate not bonded to Ru.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large g anisotropy and the deviation of the average g factor from the free electron value of 2.0023 indicate a significant contribution from the heavy metal with its high spin‐orbit coupling constant to the spin distribution . The Ru III chlorido complex 1 III also shows a characteristic signal of the corresponding unpaired electron, but with a broader signature (Figure S5e) . Both the Ru II and Ru IV derivatives, 2 II and 2 IV , are EPR‐silent as expected for complexes with no unpaired electrons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be classified as photoCORMs, which are sensitive to visible light even when in a solid state. A comparative study of ruthenium complexes, with R-mian and R-bian in the catalytic reactions of the epoxidation of alkenes [38,39] and oxidation of alcohols [38] was carried out in the works of Lahiri.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%