2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.174504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic specific heat of two-band layered superconductors: Analysis within the generalized two-bandαmodel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously the heat capacity in the normal phase is not dependent on J. Similar behavior has been described theoretically using α model e.g., in MgB 2 [68][69][70], where interactions are described by the electronphonon coupling. Figure 6.…”
Section: Specific Heatsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Obviously the heat capacity in the normal phase is not dependent on J. Similar behavior has been described theoretically using α model e.g., in MgB 2 [68][69][70], where interactions are described by the electronphonon coupling. Figure 6.…”
Section: Specific Heatsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…An advanced multiband Eliashberg analysis along these lines is necessary to reconsider/check the strong coupling results mentioned above. A weak-coupling interband regime within twoand three-band descriptions has also been found for Codoped Ba-122 [63,103], based on specific heat and optical data. These works found a non-BCS shape of the T -dependent small gap functions, which affected the behavior of the penetration depth, in contrast to a BCS-like shape expected for a dominant interband coupling.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 77%
“…In doing so, one usually finds (see e.g., Ref. that one of the Drude peaks is quite broad compared to the other. This also happens in the two special cases under consideration Ca‐122 and K‐122 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is somewhat surprising for two reasons. First, the curve has not been refined in any way, and second, this is a simple superposition of two single-band BCS models and not a more sophisticated two-band model of superconductivity that considers both intraband as well as interband pairing [64][65][66]. On the other hand, since this approach appears to work rather well, we speculate that the large difference in the scattering rates in the two bands allows for this simpler interpretation.…”
Section: Multiband Superconductormentioning
confidence: 99%