Electronic [re]constitution of groups: Group dynamics from face-to-face to an online setting

Abstract

The authors work as online tutors for a BSc (Hons) physiotherapy programme at Coventry University in the United Kingdom. This paper represents a stage in our developing understanding, over a 3 year period, of the impact of group dynamics on online interaction among physiotherapy students engaged in sharing with their peers their first experiences of clinical practice. The literature exploring online interaction tends to situate meaning either in theories borrowed from conventional face-to-face interaction or on virtual interaction. Research focusing on 'blended learning' that combines face-to-face and online interaction is limited in terms of considering how group dynamics impact groups that are constituted and reconstituted in the two very different learning contexts. Using a case study approach, the authors consider how group dynamics change as groups move from face-to-face to online collaboration in pursuit of learning objectives. We characterize typical features of the cases and draw conclusions based on similarities and differences. Findings suggest that group learning is linked to group cohesion, which appears to be mediated by social and cognitive factors that students bring with them. Social presence appears vital to positive group dynamics and is a precursor to cognitive presence, which develops when groups rise above their desire to be sociable and supportive. Group dynamics, whether positive or negative, and their consequent impact on interaction appear to be relatively stable across contexts once the group scene is set through face-to-face interaction. Engagement and interaction of individual students, however, can alter when face-to-face interaction moves online.

Non-native EFL Teacher Trainees’ Attitude towards the Recruitment of NESTs and Teacher Collaboration in Language Classrooms

“…However, it takes time for team partners to share the missions and understand the goals, and it is expected to see varying levels of resistance from team members. Collaborative skills such as collegial enquiry and reflection are needed to resolve conflicts (Clouder et al, 2006;Pedder & MacBeath, 2008), and engaging in collaborative learning seems to be a promising way to develop these collaborative skills (Chai & Tan, 2009;Laurillard, 2009). Team teaching may be most effective when it is "team learning" (Tajino & Tajino, 2000), in which team teachers are encouraged to engage jointly in information exchange, consultation, and transfer of responsibilities.…”

A Case Study of ESL Students’ Remote Speaking Class Learning Experiences in a Canada University During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…This model of learning usually consists of video/audio conferences and instant messaging through cameras and microphones. The use of synchronous learning approaches enhances student engagement, supports group identity, and enables timely feedback from instructors (Brown et al, 2016;Clouder et al, 2006;Falloon, 2011). In asynchronous learning, instead of meeting virtually in real-time, learners go through the learning process at their convenience of time and location (Moore, 2016).…”

Assessing Online Learning in Law Schools: Students Say Online Classes Deliver

“…For example, Professor Lynn Clouder et al found that when group interactions shifted from a face-to-face setting to an asynchronous online setting, the role of the online facilitator "cannot be underestimated" and that the professor serves "as a central feature of the model and a link from one context to the other." 254 time-management skills. 259 One might expect that, on the whole, law students and other graduate students are more likely than undergraduate students to be self-disciplined.…”