2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic properties of β-graphyne bilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the ΔE ads energy difference between the curve of graphene and graphyne (see Figure A) stands for the maximum decrease in the adsorption strength in GY with respect to graphene, which is of ∼30% for PAHs with low N H :N C ratio (like graphene) and 12% for PAHs with high N H :N C ratio (like benzene). In this regard, the veracity of the predicted binding energy for the graphene–graphyne interaction (and in general of the Equation ) is well supported by comparison with the binding energies of graphyne bilayers, which are in the range of 19–24 meV/atom . The interaction strength of the graphyne–graphyne interaction is lower than the graphyne–graphene as expected, and the decrease must be of at least 30% as noted above from the Equation and Figure A.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Moreover, the ΔE ads energy difference between the curve of graphene and graphyne (see Figure A) stands for the maximum decrease in the adsorption strength in GY with respect to graphene, which is of ∼30% for PAHs with low N H :N C ratio (like graphene) and 12% for PAHs with high N H :N C ratio (like benzene). In this regard, the veracity of the predicted binding energy for the graphene–graphyne interaction (and in general of the Equation ) is well supported by comparison with the binding energies of graphyne bilayers, which are in the range of 19–24 meV/atom . The interaction strength of the graphyne–graphyne interaction is lower than the graphyne–graphene as expected, and the decrease must be of at least 30% as noted above from the Equation and Figure A.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This is similar to one of the most stable stacking modes Aa of the α-graphyne 75 bilayer and also to that of β-graphyne. 76 It is obvious that AA-stacking is not favorable than AB or AC-stacking due to interelectronic repulsions. In the most stable AC-staking mode, two cp-graphyne monolayers are stacked together with a maximum binding energy of 42 meV/atom at an optimal interlayer distance of 3.6 Å.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal electrons of GDY can move quickly even in a small potential field, thus attracting wide attention as OFETs. 45,118,146,150,162,163 Cui et al prepared a GDY doped P- o -FBDTP-C 8 DTBTff OFET (GDY/PFC), leading to the significant improvement of the OFET's electron mobility from 0.002 to 0.69 cm 2 V −1 s −1 (Fig. 8a).…”
Section: Advanced Applications Of Graphdiynementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, GDY materials have been explored by many groups and have been proved to have a outstanding performance like GR in optics, electricity and biomedicine. 28–59 The great research and application potentials of GDY in the fields of energy, the environment and health are rewarded by scientists with profound expectation to promote scientific research progress greatly, especially for catalysis. 34,60–63…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%