2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic properties of rhombohedral graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As compared to the bulk bands of rhombohedral graphite with DFT 7,[23][24][25] and tight binding 25 calculations, and to the evolution of graphene to graphite with tight binding calculation 19 , it is clear that these states are surface states of the few-layer rhombohedral graphene. In order to understand the amount of charge needed to fill the flat surface band and close the gap, we have integrated first peak of the density of states above the gap.…”
Section: Appendix C: Metallic and Paramagnetic Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As compared to the bulk bands of rhombohedral graphite with DFT 7,[23][24][25] and tight binding 25 calculations, and to the evolution of graphene to graphite with tight binding calculation 19 , it is clear that these states are surface states of the few-layer rhombohedral graphene. In order to understand the amount of charge needed to fill the flat surface band and close the gap, we have integrated first peak of the density of states above the gap.…”
Section: Appendix C: Metallic and Paramagnetic Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was recently shown that even "graphene flakes" can generate 2D bands composed of more than one Lorentzian fitting component [28]. The interlayer distance in graphite equals to about 0.335 nm [29] and slightly varies with stacking order [30]. Since the processes of migration of carbon atoms from SiC interface and decomposition of silicon-carbide substrate are going simultaneously one should not expect drastic change of the thickness of deposited carbon layer.…”
Section: Profile Number Nsc1 1 N S C 1 3 N S C 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before a further discussion on the other physical properties in the present study, we made a comparison in the energy dispersions between TB and FP theories carefully (Fig. 2 and 3), 54 examining if the atomic interactions are suitable in TB model or not. It shows a good agreement in low energy, such as Fermi velocity, band-edge states, degeneracy, k z dependence, overlaps between the conduction and valence bands, linear and parabolic bands with and without degeneracy, anisotropic dispersion, and its semimetal property.…”
Section: Energy Dispersionsmentioning
confidence: 99%