31st European Conference on Optical Communications (ECOC 2005) 2005
DOI: 10.1049/cp:20050466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic precompensation techniques to combat dispersion and nonlinearities in optical transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3], for non-return-to-zero on-off keying (NRZ-OOK). One should note that SPM-induced distortions can in principle be pre-distorted for at the transmitter [3,4], while it is not possible to implement predistortion to compensate XPM in optically-routed networks [3]. Here, we study the impact of fiber nonlinearities in EPD on four advanced modulation formats and show that phase-encoded signals experience nearly as large an impact from SPM and XPM as intensity-encoded formats when using an EPD transmitter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3], for non-return-to-zero on-off keying (NRZ-OOK). One should note that SPM-induced distortions can in principle be pre-distorted for at the transmitter [3,4], while it is not possible to implement predistortion to compensate XPM in optically-routed networks [3]. Here, we study the impact of fiber nonlinearities in EPD on four advanced modulation formats and show that phase-encoded signals experience nearly as large an impact from SPM and XPM as intensity-encoded formats when using an EPD transmitter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The concept of EPD intends to remove optical dispersion compensation (ODC), which is utilized in optical transmission systems to minimize the effects of fiber nonlinearities [2]. As one might expect, putting all the dispersion compensation at the transmitter by using EPD has deep consequences on nonlinear transmission: firstly, self-phase modulation (SPM) forces a reduction in fiber launch power for EPD relative to ODC [3,4]. Secondly, cross-phase modulation (XPM) is not suppressed effectively due to the absence of proper dispersion management in EPD, and, thirdly, large power variations in the pre-distorted waveform result in high data-dependent penalties, as was demonstrated in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of predistortion, implemented using a dual-drive Mach-Zehnder modulator (Fig 15) was shown to offer effective dispersion compensation of over 1000 km of standard SMF using purely electronic techniques [43][44][45][46][47]. Finally, the method of intradyne coherent detection was experimentally demonstrated to offer the advantages of homodyne techniques, allowing improved receiver sensitivity and effective dispersion compensation in the electronic domain following detection, without the need to phase lock the local oscillator (LO) lasers [48].…”
Section: Electronic Equalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consequently a more cost-effective approach than conventional coherent systems which require optical phase-locked loops (OPLL). The work on electronic equalisation is presented in more detail elsewhere [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Electronic Equalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, significantly lower optical launch powers have to be used in EPD experiments compared to conventional transmission systems in order to reduce the SPM penalty [1,4]. Several simulations have been reported on the influence of cross-phase modulation (XPM) in 10-Gb/s pre-distorted transmission systems [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%