Electronic Patient Information – Pioneers and MuchMore

Giere, W

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1633914

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Impact of CPRs on Data Quality Today, CPRs are used first and foremost to support patient care, and are thus judged by their end users on their value for direct patient care [31,32]. However, advancing CPRs' value so as to prompt better care, coordinate care, and support medical decision making and operations and quality management, requires sufficient reuse of pre-entered patient data for multiple purposes [33]. Thus, the accuracy of CPR data is of vital importance for all health care areas [32], and measuring, characterizing and finding ways to improve the accuracy of data in CPRs is essential [34].…”

Section: How To Enhance the Quality And Reuse Of Cpr Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section 2: Patient Records: The Computerized Patient Record: Where Do We Stand?

Jaspers¹,

Knaup²,

Schmidt³

2006

Yearb Med Inform

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryTo provide an overview of trends in research, developments and implementations of the computerized patient record (CPR) of the last two years.We surveyed the medical informatics literature, spanning the years 2004-2005, focusing on publications on CPRs.The main trends revealed were: 1) the development of technologies to realize privacy and security goals or remote data entry and access to CPRs; 2) investigations into how to enhance the quality and reuse of CPR data; 3) the development and evaluation of decision support functions to be integrated with CPRs; 4) evaluations of the impact of CPRs on clinicians, patients, clinical work settings and patient outcomes; and 5) the further development and use of standards to move towards shared electronic health records (EHRs).The CPR is playing a growing part in medical informatics research and evaluation studies, but the goal of establishing a comprehensive lifelong EHR is still a long way off. In moving forward to EHRs, convergence of EHR standards seems required to realize true interoperability of health care applications. User acceptance of present-day CPRs (for all categories of users) and compatibility with work patterns has not been achieved yet, and can only be realized by giving these goals high priority. This will require substantial resources for in-depth work flow analysis, development and evaluation of CPRs. Besides this, the implementation of effective CPRs asks for health care organizations that are willing to invest in new developments and to contribute to evaluation studies, to further improve CPRs’ functionalities and enhance their use in practice.Haux R, Kulikowski C, editors. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2006.

show abstract

Section: How To Enhance the Quality And Reuse Of Cpr Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section 2: Patient Records: The Computerized Patient Record: Where Do We Stand?

Jaspers¹,

Knaup²,

Schmidt³

2006

Yearb Med Inform

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Electronic patientr ecords have al ong historyi nm edical informatics [ 6]. Mainly dealing with billingdatainthe early years, a currentEHR supportsmanykindsofphenotypicpatient data [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration of Genomic Data in Electronic Health Records

Sax

Schmidt²

2005

Methods Inf Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This paperisprimarilybased on the lectures presented at the farewell symposium for Wo lfgangGiere,inMay 2003 in Frankfurt. Giere is one of the pioneers of electronic patient information.Hewas the director of the Department of Medical Informatics at the FrankfurtUniversity Hospital, andoverdecades hasinfluenced the construction of electric medical records andpatient information [1]e specially during the beginning phases in Germany [2]. Manyotherpioneershave contributed to the worldwide success of the electronic medical record,because "success hasm anyf athers",a nd as election of "fathers" is mentioned here especially with regard,o nt he one hand,t om edical documentation as an often neglected basicdiscipline for medical record keeping,and,onthe other hand,w ith af ocus on the lectures of thisf arewells ymposium.Iam grateful for the manuscripts of Octo Barnett, Ruth Dayhoff, Eckhard Fleck,Michael Schopen/ FrankW arda,G ustavW agner, Homer Warner,and Yo ichi Satomura.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%