2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2005.03.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic nose technique potential monitoring mandarin maturity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique of global aroma analysis by means of EN has been considered very promising during the last 15 years as a non-destructive tool to evaluate fruit quality, as shown in the comprehensive review of Peris and Escuder-Gilabert (2009), from different points of view: shelf-life investigation to assess "Jonagold" (Saevels et al, 2003) and "Pinklady" (Brezmes et al, 2001a) apples quality during shelf-life, to monitor tomato fruit with different storage time (Gómez et al, 2008); harvest date determinations in mandarins (Gomez et al, 2006), apples (Saevels et al, 2003) and mango fruit (Lebrun et al, 2008), to classify "Gala" apples at harvest in different maturity degrees (Pathange et al, 2006), faults detection as to detect freeze damage in oranges (Tan et al, 2005) or apples defects as mealiness and skin damage in "Cox" (di Natale et al, 2001) and "Red Delicious" apples (Li et al, 2007), and for blueberry fruit disease detection and classification (Li et al, 2010).…”
Section: Electronic Nosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique of global aroma analysis by means of EN has been considered very promising during the last 15 years as a non-destructive tool to evaluate fruit quality, as shown in the comprehensive review of Peris and Escuder-Gilabert (2009), from different points of view: shelf-life investigation to assess "Jonagold" (Saevels et al, 2003) and "Pinklady" (Brezmes et al, 2001a) apples quality during shelf-life, to monitor tomato fruit with different storage time (Gómez et al, 2008); harvest date determinations in mandarins (Gomez et al, 2006), apples (Saevels et al, 2003) and mango fruit (Lebrun et al, 2008), to classify "Gala" apples at harvest in different maturity degrees (Pathange et al, 2006), faults detection as to detect freeze damage in oranges (Tan et al, 2005) or apples defects as mealiness and skin damage in "Cox" (di Natale et al, 2001) and "Red Delicious" apples (Li et al, 2007), and for blueberry fruit disease detection and classification (Li et al, 2010).…”
Section: Electronic Nosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, LDA uses the pooled covariance matrix in calculating the (generalized) squared distances. LDA and QDA are extensively used for classification of sample in different groups in the area of electronic nose technology [6,[22][23][24][25]. The data analysis was carried out using SAS (Version 9.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aroma is the most important factor influencing consumers' purchase intent, estimation of food quality and food acceptance (Bakker, 1997;Santonico et al, 2008). It is a specific sensory characteristic detected when volatile compounds enter the nasal portion of the olfactory system down through the back of the throat and get to be detected by olfactory receptors (Gomez et al, 2006). Despite the importance of aroma as a food quality indicator, quality and acceptability of a product are traditionally monitored in food industry settings by virtue of production processes' control via physicochemical measurements such as pH-value and colour, as well as by virtue of spectroscopic determination of concentrations of particular molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%