2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic microarray assays for avian influenza and Newcastle disease virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of Reverse Transcription real-time, digital PCR with Sanger sequencing or applications of Next Generation Sequencing and oligonucleotide microarrays can give great results, but they are expensive and highly demanding for trained technician and elaborate equipment [39, 66, 67]. As an alternative, many protocols, based on techniques like restriction endonuclease analyses, peptide nucleic acid with gold nanoparticles assay, phage-capturing dot blot, in situ hybridization, RT-PCR, and probe-based real-time RT-PCR, were proposed [6872].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of Reverse Transcription real-time, digital PCR with Sanger sequencing or applications of Next Generation Sequencing and oligonucleotide microarrays can give great results, but they are expensive and highly demanding for trained technician and elaborate equipment [39, 66, 67]. As an alternative, many protocols, based on techniques like restriction endonuclease analyses, peptide nucleic acid with gold nanoparticles assay, phage-capturing dot blot, in situ hybridization, RT-PCR, and probe-based real-time RT-PCR, were proposed [6872].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, AIV typing microarray tests can detect and provide additional information about the subtype detected in positive clinical samples compared with that obtained using realtime-PCR [20]. In contrast, AIV typing microarray tests can detect and provide additional information about the subtype detected in positive clinical samples compared with that obtained using realtime-PCR [20].…”
Section: Conventional Methods: Elisa and Pcrmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…PCR primer and capture probe sequences were either identified from the literature, then used with or without modifications or were newly designed (Tables and ). Primer and probe design were performed as described previously (Lung et al., , ) using AlleleID ® v. 7.7 (Premier BioSoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA), Clone Manager v 9.0 software (Scientific and Educational Software, Cary, NC, USA) and BioEdit (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html) using all publicly available sequences from NCBI. Primers were tested in silico using IDT's OligoAnalyzer 3.1 (http://www.idtdna.com/calc/analyzer), and any primers with self‐ and hetero‐dimers with a ΔG ≥ −11 kcal/mole were modified or screened out.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Reverse primers contain a complimentary tag sequence for Red Universal Reporter probe at the 5′ end (Lung et al., ). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation