2019
DOI: 10.1002/mp.13910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic intracavitary brachytherapy quality management based on risk analysis: The report of AAPM TG 182

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide guidance on quality management for electronic brachytherapy. Materials and Methods: The task group used the risk-assessment approach of Task Group 100 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Because the quality management program for a device is intimately tied to the procedure in which it is used, the task group first designed quality interventions for intracavitary brachytherapy for both commercial electronic brachytherapy units in the setting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical aspects of treatments of skin cancers with brachytherapy sources have been shared in recent publications from the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 1 and the Groupe Européan de Curiethérapie--European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO). 2 Clinical dosimetry and quality management (QM) practices for traditional uses of HDR brachytherapy sources, superficial x-ray units, and electronically generated x-rays are addressed by the Task Group 43 (TG 43), 12 TG 43U1, [13][14][15] TG 61, 16 TG 167, 17 and TG 182 18 reports, and Report No. 229.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical aspects of treatments of skin cancers with brachytherapy sources have been shared in recent publications from the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) 1 and the Groupe Européan de Curiethérapie--European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO). 2 Clinical dosimetry and quality management (QM) practices for traditional uses of HDR brachytherapy sources, superficial x-ray units, and electronically generated x-rays are addressed by the Task Group 43 (TG 43), 12 TG 43U1, [13][14][15] TG 61, 16 TG 167, 17 and TG 182 18 reports, and Report No. 229.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical dosimetry and quality management (QM) practices for traditional uses of HDR brachytherapy sources, superficial x‐ray units, and electronically generated x‐rays are addressed by the Task Group 43 (TG 43), 12 TG 43U1, 13–15 TG 61, 16 TG 167, 17 and TG 182 18 reports, and Report No. 229 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some intra-operative applications of ELS have been shown to result in exposure rates to operating room staff of 2 mSv h −1 at approximately 30 cm from a treated area (Mobit et al., 2015). As in all forms of radiation therapy, ELS requires proper initial and ongoing training of the entire treatment team, with detailed attention to personnel, equipment, patient, and personnel safety (Devlin et al., 2017). (178) Techniques in risk analysis and development of a quality management programme for electronic brachytherapy have been developed by a task group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine based on the principles of Task Group 100 (Huq et al., 2016; Thomadsen et al., 2020).…”
Section: Radiological Protection Methods and Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(178) Techniques in risk analysis and development of a quality management programme for electronic brachytherapy have been developed by a task group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine based on the principles of Task Group 100 (Huq et al., 2016; Thomadsen et al., 2020).…”
Section: Radiological Protection Methods and Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before any irradiation a QA procedure is mandatory and for this purpose the unit uses a diode array (PDA) to verify the dynamic offset of the electron beam and another separate device (PAICH) with a PTW plane parallel 23342 ion chamber to check the output stability. The QA procedure is described in the Zeiss supplied user manual and in the report of AAPM TG-182 [26].…”
Section: The X-ray Source For Angular Responsementioning
confidence: 99%